Answer:
yes it does
Step-by-step explanation:
as you can see,
in a function, we don't have more than one y for a x, so here we have one y for each x. then it is
I think it’s 12.67 I’m not so sure
Add 32 and 1,200 then subtract your answer with 15. Then that is your answer
I assume each path
is oriented positively/counterclockwise.
(a) Parameterize
by

with
. Then the line element is

and the integral reduces to

The integrand is symmetric about
, so

Substitute
and
. Then we get

(b) Parameterize
by

with
. Then

and

Integrate by parts with



(c) Parameterize
by

with
. Then

and

Answer: 
Step-by-step explanation:
Some transformations for a function f(x) are shown below:
If
, the function is translated up "k" units.
If
, the function is translated down "k" units.
If
, the function is reflected across the x-axis.
If
, the function is reflected across the y-axis.
Therefore, knowing those transformations and given the exponential parent function:

If it is reflected across the y-axis and the it is translated down 4 units, we can determine that the resulting function is:
