Answer:
The answer is C
Explanation:
To maximize profits in a perfectly competitive market, firms or businesses' marginal revenue must equal to marginal cost (MR=MC).
Also price must equate marginal cost(which is the additional cost incurred in the production of one more unit of a good)
In perfect competition, P = MC = MR.
But in monopolistic Competition or monopoly P > MC
Answer:
Under government bankruptcy laws of the United States, anybody can declare financial insolvency in order to look for help from leasers. In any case, this comes to the detriment of harming one's financial assessments for quite a while (now and then upto a multi year time span) alongside bringing about critical lawful,, procedural and court charges.
That being stated, liquidations are significantly troublesome procedures essentially in light of the fact that loan bosses would not need any account holder to take the easy way off in the event that the indebted person wouldn't like to restitution. This is considerably progressively evident if there should be an occurrence of understudy advances where the borrower (Kay for this situation) needs to demonstrate without sensible uncertainty that he/she would confront "undue hardship" in the event that he/she were to continue with credit reimbursements. The "undue hardship" demonstrating part is available to an assortment of understandings, rounds of questioning and lawful examination by the courtroom. Most courts use the "Brunner Test" to decide an indebted person's qualification for understudy advance release. The key arrangements of the test are set somewhere around the United States Department of Education's, Federal Student Aid Office as given beneath:
(a) The account holder, in view of his/her present pay and costs, can't keep up a better than average "insignificant" way of life for himself/herself and his/her wards in the event that he/she were to proceed with the advance reimbursements.
(b) Additional conditions demonstrate certain the way that this condition will prevail for a larger part of the residency of the advance reimbursement.
(c) The borrower has taken a stab at reimbursing his/her understudy advance in accordance with some basic honesty up until this point.
In this specific situation, Kay would be in an ideal situation in attempting to get the advance deferred, on the off chance that she declares financial insolvency post changing her activity. This is so on the grounds that her present place of employment pays enough to reimburse her understudy advance and consequently don't meet two of the three Brunner Test models. Exchanging over to the non benefit employment would compromise her present way of life (and most likely that of her wards) and adjusts to the fundamental soul of the "Brunner Test". It would off base be upto her legitimate insight to demonstrate this danger (post work change) to her expectation for everyday comforts before the court and addition an understudy advance waiver.
All parties in the chain of distribution of a defective product are strictly liable for the injuries caused by that product.
Chain of distribution refers to everyone involved in a transaction of a product from the beginning stages to the end when the consumer has the product. Strict liability is a doctrine that states all parties in the chain of distribution of a defective product are liable for the damages caused by it.
Negative shocks reduce production and increase unemployment. Positive shocks increase production and reduce unemployment.
Unexpected change moving SRAS. A positive supply shock increases SRAS, whereas a negative supply shock decreases SRAS. A combination of slowing overall economic output (declining) and rising price levels (inflation). Stagnation occurs when SRAS decreases.
A negative supply shock leads to an increase in the natural rate of interest. If real interest rates are not adjusted, there will be excess demand in the labor market. t = 0 unless the real interest rate is adjusted. Then we move into an economy where the market is imperfect.
A supply shock is an unexpected event in which the supply of a product or commodity changes, causing a sudden change in price. A positive supply shock increases output and decreases prices, while a negative supply shock decreases output and increases prices.
Learn more about supply at
brainly.com/question/25843620
#SPJ4
Answer:
A. account balance being audited is fairly stated.
Explanation:
The auditors principal objective when using a sample of tests of details of balances is to know whether the account balance being audited is fairly stated.
To select a sample size for substantive tests of balances, the auditor should consider a decrease in the tolerable misstatements in order to have a larger sample.
