Answer:
We can see that every child has a different calibre to understand and learn things. Some children do not tend to have a strong mind in certain field and have to work hard in those subjects. Others might be hardworking and good at a subject. Among children, a teacher might know students who have a good understanding of a subject but are careless towards their responsibilities. Such children are intelligent but lazy.
In the scenario mentioned in the question, the teacher should ask the child to complete the task at home or during free time.
Answer: Possession processing
Explanation:
The possession processing is basically refers to the various types of tangible action for the products and the services and different types of other physical possessions that are belongs to the consumers or the users.
According to the given service processes context, Tina is providing the various types of services such as maintaining the gardens, planting and also designing the new garden that comes under the category of possessions processing.
Therefore, Possessions processing is the correct answer.
The correct answer is B., although that hardly ever happens, but when it does, its a big deal and is called ramification. I hope you found this helpful, and, if so, please mark as brainliest. thank you ((:
1.<span>Mentuhotep II wore the Double Crown of </span>Egypt<span>, which represented the unification of Upper and Lower </span>Egypt<span>.
2.</span>That there is only one god.3.One law is do not steal from someone else.
hope it helps
Answer:
- Good faith exception.
Explanation:
'Good Faith Exception' is demonstrated as the legal tenet which proffers the exemption or exception form the exclusionary rule as the IVth Amendment of U.S. Constitution states that 'if the evidence collected by the police through unlawful searches or seizures but done with a good faith belief, it could be admissible at the trial'.
As per the given description, <u>'good faith exception'</u> demonstrate the exemption to the exclusionary rule because the exclusionary rule usually states that evidence collected unlawfully or by violating the right to privacy would not be admissible during the trial but the 'good faith' exception states that 'if the law enforcement officers believe that their actions are in 'good-faith' it can be admissible by the court which marks the exception.
