Answer:
$239,060
Explanation:
The computation of the net income distributed to Carr as follows;
<u>
Particulars Carr Mason net income distributed Non-allocated </u>
Net income $442,000
Salary
allowance $42,000 $42,000 $400,000
Interest
on capital $4,410 $10,290 $14,700 $385,300
left amount $192,650 $192,650 $385,300 $0
Net income $239,060
Answer:
The correct answer is D
Explanation:
Under the doctrine of the stare decisis, the court will look into the past or the similar issues in order to guide their decisions related to the issues. And the past decisions are referred or acknowledged as the precedent.
Precedent is the principle or rule which is legal and it is established or created by the decision of the court. And this decision become the authority or the example for judging or deciding the similar issues.
Therefore, in this case, the trial court when deciding upon the case of D v E, will likely to allow or permit the minor to cancel the contract or the agreement.
Answer: Trained incapacity
Explanation: In simple words, it refers to the idea that after gaining a certain kind of education, skill or experience etc. the level of thinking of an individual cannot go beyond a certain limit.
In the given case, the manager was the upper level employee and was not habitual to the work that was performed by the workers in the restaurant.
Therefore this position in the workplace limited his skills of performing only the managerial work.
Hence from the above we can conclude that the above case depicts trained incapacity.
Answer:
a) 100 units
b) 2.5 order per year
c) 50 units
Explanation:
Given data:
demand 250 units
order cost is $20
holding cost $1
a) Economic order quantity
b) number of order for each year
order/ year
c) average inventory