Answer:
requires voluntary, effortful management of emotions
Explanation:
Emotional self-regulation refers to our individual capability to tolerate negative emotions that caused by unwanted circumstances in our life . (Sadness that we feel after a break up, anger the we felt from entitled customers, etc)
In order to do emotional self-regulation , we have to develop an understanding on why we feel a certain way. When we got this understanding, we have to voluntarily control ourselves every time that emotions started to take over and Prevent ourselves from responding with extreme measures.
The infamous case of Brown v. Board of Education stated that racial segregation is unconstitutional and must not indicate an inferiority or superiority of one race over the other.
<h3>What is the significance of Brown v. Board of Education?</h3>
Brown v. Board of Education is one of the most important and landmark cases to have happened in the United States, where the court held on to its judgment that racial segregation in schools shall be deemed as unconstitutional.
Hence, the significance of Brown v. Board of Education is as aforementioned.
Learn more about Brown v. Board of Education here:
brainly.com/question/14637388
#SPJ1
Answer:
21 years after Columbus reached San Salvador Balboa saw the Pacific
Answer:
government in the sunshine act
Explanation:
In response to the mistrust of the federal government that grew out of the Vietnam War and the Watergate scandal, in 1976, Congress enacted the <u>Government in the Sunshine Act</u>, which tried to increase transparency by requiring that government agencies hold open forums to allow the public to comment on their decisions, regulations, and performance.
<span>Women and men differ in their career choices both across and within fields, and psychology is no exception. Although subfield segregation has been reduced over the years, subfield differences persist (see Table 1). For example, in 2002, 82.7% of PhDs in developmental psychology were awarded to women, while only 56.2.% of PhDs in experimental psychology were awarded to women. (We excluded comparative, psychometrics, quantitative, and personality because of the small number of graduates: 7, 13, 8, and 23, respectively.) However, of new PhDs awarded in psychology in 2002, women earned more than 50% across all subfields (again, excluding comparative, psychometrics, quantitative, and personality). Unfortunately, the increasing number and proportions of psychologists who are women have not translated into equal professional participation across various subfields and leadership positions within psychology.</span>
