B would be the answer I think
Based on the thoughts of Keven, we can infer that this is a<u> hasty generalization fallacy. </u>
<h3>What is a hasty generalization fallacy?</h3>
- Coming to a conclusion about a population based on observations from a very small sample size.
- It is usually false and overblown.
Kevin came to his decision based on the small sample size of his grandparents alone. They are simply too small to account for the millions of older people out there.
In conclusion, option D is correct.
Find out more on hasty generalization at brainly.com/question/1580820.
Answer:
He used customs and beliefs from the many local religions in the empire to create a new religion.
Explanation:
Answer: The main difference between rules and laws is the consequences associated with breaking them. While each is developed to invoke a sense of order, fair play, and safety, the weight of a law is much heavier than the weight of a rule. Laws are like the legal version of rules. Laws are made by government officials, unlike rules can be , made by anyone.
Explanation:
The statements that supports Sue's position that judges should be elected is that Judges are representatives of the people in government just like other officials and should represent majority will.
<h3>How are the Judges choosen?</h3>
In the Judiciary, the justices are often nominated by the President and confirmed by Congress and once in office, the judges can remain in their positions for life.
In practice, the Judges are not elected rather, they are appointed because of the need to make them independent of external forces.
Hence, the statements that supports Sue's position that judges should be elected is that Judges are representatives of the people in government just like other officials and should represent majority will.
Read more about Judges nomination
brainly.com/question/7576271
#SPJ1
