1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
melomori [17]
2 years ago
5

I need help please. Only answer if you read The battle of greasy grass and The little horn massacre .

History
2 answers:
Korvikt [17]2 years ago
8 0

Answer: because of there same qualities in each other

Explanation:

LuckyWell [14K]2 years ago
6 0

Answer: The perspective of the accounts helps communicate the different messages because there can be two differing opinions on the event and two opinions gives the reader a choice on what to believe.

Explanation:

You might be interested in
When did israel agree to withdrawal sinai peninsula.
klemol [59]

Answer:

January 18, 1974

Explanation:

A disengagement agreement between Israel and Egypt, signed on January 18, 1974, provided for Israeli withdrawal into the Sinai west of the Mitla and Gidi passes, while Egypt was to reduce the size of its forces on the east bank of the canal. A UN peacekeeping force was established between the two armies.

4 0
2 years ago
What compromise might be found that would be supported by New Jersey as well as by states that wanted the legislature based on t
MAXImum [283]
The Great Comprise or the Connecticut Comprise I believe
4 0
3 years ago
What is cultural convergence in Africa ?
adell [148]

Cultural convergence is a trend where two cultures that interact a lot start to appear more similar to each other. This is especially pronounced among cultures that have high degrees of communication, relative ease of transportation between them, and are united under some organizational system. i hope  it helped

6 0
3 years ago
How does God respond to the Israelites encounter with the Amalekites at Rephidum?
Sholpan [36]
During the Exodus, when Moses and the Israelites crossed the Gulf of Aqaba and entered the land of Midian, they were met, at a place called Rephidim, by an army of Amalekites. The Bible recounts the events that took place:

Now Amalek came and fought with Israel in Rephidim. And Moses said to Joshua, "Choose us some men and go out, fight with Amalek. Tomorrow I will stand on the top of the hill with the rod of God in my hand." So Joshua did as Moses said to him, and fought with Amalek. And Moses, Aaron, and Hur went up to the top of the hill. And so it was, when Moses held up his hand, that Israel prevailed; and when he let down his hand, Amalek prevailed. But Moses' hands be came heavy; so they took a stone and put it under him, and he sat on it. And Aaron and Hur supported his hands, one on one side, and the other on the other side; and his hands were steady until the going down of the sun. So Joshua defeated Amalek and his people with the edge of the sword. -- Exodus 17:8-13, NKJV.

Just who were these Amalekites, and where did they come from? And what was to be their ultimate place in history?

Origins of Amalek

The Bible dictionary, Insight on the Scriptures, states that Amalek was a "son of Esau's first born Eliphaz, by his concubine Timna. (Ge. 36:12, 16) Amalek, a grandson of Esau, was one of the sheiks of Edom. (Ge. 36:15, 16) Amalek's name also designated his tribal descendants. -- De. 25:17; Jg. 7:12; 1 Sa. 15:2" (Watchtower Bible & Tract Society of New York, Inc. 1988. p. 86.)

While it is true Amalek's name designated his tribal descendants, there is a belief that Amalek dates back BEYOND the time of Esau; and this is backed up by the account of Chedorlaomer and the kings in Genesis 14:

In the fourteenth year Chadorlaomer and the kings that were with him came and attacked the Rephaim in Ashteroth Karnaim, the Zuzim in Ham, the Emim in Shaveh Kiriathaim, and the Horites in their mountain of Seir, as far as El Paran, which is by the wilderness.

Then they turned back and carne to En Mishpat (that is, Kadesh), and ATTACKED ALL THE COUNTRIES OF THE AMALEKITES, and also the Amorites who dwelt in Hazezon Tamar. -- Verse
5 0
3 years ago
Which statement describes an effect of urbanization?
jeka94
I think you forgot to add the options but based on my research, the correct answer is "The unemployment rate increased in cities." This statement describes an effect of urbanization. Thank you for posting your question. I hope this answer helped you. Let me know if you need more help. 
9 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • When Rome conquered territories, they were allowed to continue to practice their own religions.
    10·2 answers
  • Which term was used to refer to a judge in the early english courts?
    10·1 answer
  • How did Thomas Jefferson’s Louisiana Purchase benefit the United States?
    9·1 answer
  • what was the primary cause of the changes to the unemployment rate in the United States in 1920 and 1921?
    8·2 answers
  • Which does not accurately describe the Treaty of Versailles?
    10·2 answers
  • Jains stress nonviolence towards all living things, which is why animals needed for food are killed in the most humane way possi
    8·1 answer
  • ___ is the Norse name for the home of mankind.
    11·2 answers
  • What were the reasons for william's victory at the battle of hasting
    13·1 answer
  • 1920s Culture and Society <br> anything helps
    14·1 answer
  • Can any one write an essay about the following.
    15·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!