Hi there, actually, the image that you provided us with does not have any grid or graph to mark the points on
Answer:
a)what was concluded is spurious
b) what was concluded could betrue
Step-by-step explanation:
a) Considering the number in Michigan, there is higher number of crimes but considering the population in Minnesota, the population is much less than Michigan, considering the crime the crimes per capital with the population size, Therefore Minnesota could have more crimes than Michigan's so, The conclusion is not true.
b)There is reduction of crimes from 1991 to 2001, so it can be assumed that the population has increased over the times, therefore, the per capita number of crimes decreased.
Answer: 28
Step-by-step explanation: All you have to do is multiply 70 by 4 and take away the zero to get your answer
Answer:-0.2
Step-by-step explanation:
Ask Siri lol
The original price was 725.
Explanation:
"36% less than" means taking 36% away from 100%. 100-36 is 64, so 64% remains when 36% is taken away. So, 64% of the original table's price is 464.
So, if the original price was x, 464=0.64x
Solve this by dividing both sides by 0,64:
725=x
So, the original price was 725.