1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Butoxors [25]
2 years ago
6

20%20%5Cdisplaystyle%20%5Crm%20%5Csum_%7B%20%20n_%7B2%7D%20%3D%201%7D%5E%20%5Cinfty%20%20%20%5Cdots%20%5Cdisplaystyle%20%5Crm%20%5Csum_%7B%20%20n_%7B2022%7D%20%3D%201%7D%5E%20%5Cinfty%20%20%20%5Cfrac%7B1%7D%7Bn_%7B1%7D%20n_2%20%5Cdots%20n_%7B2022%7D%28n_%7B1%7D%20%2B%20n_2%20%20%2B%20%5Cdots%20%2B%20%20n_%7B2022%7D%29%7D%20" id="TexFormula1" title=" \displaystyle \rm \sum_{ n_{ 1} = 1}^ \infty \displaystyle \rm \sum_{ n_{2} = 1}^ \infty \dots \displaystyle \rm \sum_{ n_{2022} = 1}^ \infty \frac{1}{n_{1} n_2 \dots n_{2022}(n_{1} + n_2 + \dots + n_{2022})} " alt=" \displaystyle \rm \sum_{ n_{ 1} = 1}^ \infty \displaystyle \rm \sum_{ n_{2} = 1}^ \infty \dots \displaystyle \rm \sum_{ n_{2022} = 1}^ \infty \frac{1}{n_{1} n_2 \dots n_{2022}(n_{1} + n_2 + \dots + n_{2022})} " align="absmiddle" class="latex-formula">​
Mathematics
1 answer:
Kay [80]2 years ago
8 0

As a simpler example, consider the iterated sum with only 2 indices,

\displaystyle \sum_{n_1=1}^\infty \sum_{n_2=1}^\infty \frac1{n_1n_2(n_1+n_2)}

(The case with just one index is pretty simple, as it reduces to ζ(2) = π²/6.)

Let

\displaystyle f(x) = \sum_{n_1=1}^\infty \sum_{n_2=1}^\infty \frac{x^{n_1+n_2}}{n_1n_2(n_1+n_2)}

Differentiating and multiplying by x, we get

\displaystyle x f'(x) = \sum_{n_1=1}^\infty \sum_{n_2=1}^\infty \frac{x^{n_1+n_2}}{n_1n_2} \\\\ = \left(\sum_{n_1=1}^\infty\frac{x^{n_1}}{n_1}\right) \left(\sum_{n_2=1}^\infty \frac{x^{n_2}}{n_2}\right) \\\\ = (-\ln(1-x))^2 = \ln^2(1-x)

\implies f'(x) = \dfrac{\ln^2(1-x)}x

By the fundamental theorem of calculus (observing that letting x = 0 in the sum makes it vanish), we have

f(x) = \displaystyle \int_0^x \frac{\ln^2(1-t)}t \, dt

If we let x approach 1 from below, f(x) will converge to the double sum and

\displaystyle \sum_{n_1=1}^\infty \sum_{n_2=1}^\infty \frac1{n_1n_2(n_1+n_2)} = \int_0^1 \frac{\ln^2(1-x)}x \, dx

In the integral, substitute x\mapsto1-x, use the power series expansion for 1/(1 - x), and integrate by parts twice.

\displaystyle \int_0^1 \frac{\ln^2(1-x)}x \, dx = \int_0^1 \frac{\ln^2(x)}{1-x} \, dx \\\\ = \sum_{m=0}^\infty \int_0^1 x^m \ln^2(x) \, dx \\\\ = \sum_{m=0}^\infty -\frac2{m+1} \int_0^1 x^m \ln(x) \, dx \\\\ = \sum_{m=0}^\infty \frac2{(m+1)^2} \int_0^1 x^m \, dx \\\\ = 2 \sum_{m=0}^\infty \frac1{(m+1)^3} \\\\ = 2 \sum_{m=1}^\infty \frac1{m^3} = 2\zeta(3)

We can generalize this method to k indices to show that

\displaystyle \sum_{n_1=1}^\infty \sum_{n_2=1}^\infty \cdots \sum_{n_k=1}^\infty \frac1{n_1n_2\cdots n_k(n_1+n_2+\cdots+n_k)} = (-1)^k \int_0^1 \frac{\ln^k(1-x)}x \, dx \\\\ = k!\,\zeta(k+1) = \Gamma(k+1)\zeta(k+1)

Then the sum we want is

\displaystyle \sum_{n_1=1}^\infty \sum_{n_2=1}^\infty \cdots \sum_{n_{2022}=1}^\infty \frac1{n_1n_2\cdots n_{2022}(n_1+n_2+\cdots+n_{2022})} = \boxed{\Gamma(2023)\zeta(2023)}

You might be interested in
Which sentence matches the mathematical equation? p-0.40p=0.60p
IRISSAK [1]
P-0.40p = 0.60p

C. Decrease by 40% is the same as multiply by 60%.

Assume that p = 10

10 - 0.40(10) = 0.60(10)
10 - 4 = 6
6 = 6

Based on the above assumption. 40% of 10 is 4 ; and 60% of 10 is 6. So, 10 less 4(40% of 10) is equal to 6 (60% of 10). 

Percentage is used because 0.40 and 0.60 will be multiplied with 100% to get the equivalent percentage 0.40 x 100% = 40% ; 0.60 x 100% = 60%
 
7 0
3 years ago
Increase 270 by 20%​
Nana76 [90]

Answer:

first find 20 percent of 270

270 times 20 divided by 100

5400 divided by 100

54

270 plus 54

324 is your final answer

-hope this helps!

5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What is 3 5/6 - 7 1/2
-Dominant- [34]
<span>-3.66666666667 is da answer

</span>
5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Seventeen members of Tim's family are going to an amusement park during the week of their family reunion. Adult tickets cost $34
baherus [9]

Answer:

c.

Step-by-step explanation:

Let x be the number of adults in Tim's family. Then (17 - x) is the number of children in Tim's family.

We have $34x + $31.5(17 - x) = $558.

$34x + $31.5(17 - x) = $558

$34x + $535.5 - $31.5x = $558

$2.5x = $22.5

x = 9

Hence the answer is c.

7 0
3 years ago
Please help, AND READ DIRECTIONS, get done as soon as possible.
katen-ka-za [31]

Answer:

IT would be 13a to 17b

Step-by-step explanation:

I had this.

7 0
2 years ago
Other questions:
  • 7,915,878 in word form
    6·1 answer
  • Someone tell me if this is right or wrong and explain it if you can! Based only on the information given in the diagram, which c
    14·2 answers
  • Can someone help me with #3? Thanks!
    15·1 answer
  • If (3,4) is reflected across the x-axis what are the new coordinates​
    12·1 answer
  • Convert 12.4 hours to hours and minutes.​
    15·2 answers
  • 2,76<br> 5. Rationalize the denominator of the following: 2 root 6 divided by root 2 + root 3
    8·1 answer
  • Two horses are filling a pool
    10·1 answer
  • If the height of the triangle given below is 35 cm, what then is its area? (Round your final answer to the tenths place, if nece
    11·1 answer
  • SOMEONE NEEDS TO EXPLAIN WHY 1.40 DIDNT WORK ON MY QUESTION 2.1/1.488
    12·1 answer
  • 8. Alana Garon obtained a personal loan of $2,200 at 12 percent for 12 months. The monthly payment is
    10·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!