Answer:
Your skull is made up of two sets of Bones .The bones of your face and the bones of your cranium, which makes up your forehead and the back of your head. Your cranium is the large bone case that surrounds your delicate brain protecting from bumps and knocks.
The answer to your question would be a joint
After some research I found the important parts mostly bolded
Advantages:
1) Although the technology at first seems like something done for convenience rather than being something of significant utility, the fact is that poorly developed nations like India which have a relatively poor vaccination program are most likely to benefit from such a vaccine.
This is also the reason why many of the projects mentioned here (including Arntzen's early work) have been funded by the WHO.
2) Mucosal immunity : The vaccines which are given parenterally (e.g. Intramuscularly) induce a systemic response but little or no local immune response in the GI tract. This so called "mucosal immunity " is increasingly being considered very important for defense against GI pathogens. ( Remember OPV..)
3) And of course, it's painless and convenient
Disadvantages:
1) The vaccine dose would be inadequate if the patient eats only one banana/potato instead of the recommended two. Furthermore, there might be difficulties in judging the dose itself since the amount of antigen in each fruit cannot be accurately measured.
2) The risk of introducing a new gene into the Plant DNA population is not known. The gene may jump species and propagate into other plants (or wild varieties of the same plants).
This may cause unpredictable results including a decrease in the number or even extinction of a particular plant species due to growth stunting caused by the viral/bacterial gene. (This has been known to occur in research studies, including Arntzen's)
3)"Oral Tolerance": In another concern, scientists need to be sure that vaccines meant to enhance immune responses do not backfire and suppress immunity instead. Research into a phenomenon called oral tolerance has shown that ingesting certain proteins can at times cause the body to shut down its responses to those proteins.
This may cause the body to become more susceptible to a particular disease agent rather than become immunized against it.
Doctors may not be comfortable with labeling a child with a personality disorder due to the fact of its early in their life. The child still has time to prosper and grow as as a person. You don't really know the childs personality yet, so the way they act might just be them learning who they are. It's better to wait it out, and see if they have have borderline personality disorder, because they could be pushing you away to be independent and not realize.
The negative with diagnosing children is they could use it as an excuse. Such as reasons to treating people a certain way. They also might be telling people, and could cause bullying issues, or making their own self esstem go down. The positive effects are knowing when older you won't really be shocked. More positive effects are you will have an idea of it, and will be aware of it, and might realize more side effects of it. Instead of becoming completely blind to it.
