All categories

2 years ago

Find the mean of the data set: {8, 10, 12, 15, 15, 18}

Mathematics

2 answers:

hoa [83]2 years ago

4 0

Answer: 13

Step-by-step explanation:

First, you add them all up which is 8+10+12+15+15+18 which is 78. Then, you divide by how much number there is which here is 6. So, I divided 78 by 6 and got 13.

BARSIC [14]2 years ago

4 0

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

Add all the numbers and divide by how many numbers are in the set:
8+10+12+15+15+18=78

78/6=13

You might be interested in

Negative 7 over 3, the whole multiplied by x minus 3 equals negative 52

Sliva [168]

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

6 0

2 years ago

Determine the rate of change for 3/2x -5/4y = 15

Aleksandr-060686 [28]

Answer:

-6/5

Step-by-step explanation:

3/2x - 5/4y = 15

-5/4y = -3/2x + 15

multiply each side by (-4/5)

(-4/5)(-5/4y) = (-4/5)(-3/2x + 15)

y = -6/5x - 12

rate of change: -6/5

6 0

3 years ago

Please response ASAP! 2+3= 9+2= 0+1= 7+4=

Stolb23 [73]

2+3=5

9+2=11

0+1=1

7+4=11

3 0

2 years ago

Read 2 more answers

In 1963, the United States Postal Service started using ZIP (Zone Improvement Plan) codes. Each ZIP code is a sequence of five d

bija089 [108]

Here is how you find the number of possible U.S Zip codes.
Take note of this: There are 10 1 digit numbers: 0,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9.
And we have 5 slots. So in each slot, there can be 10 possible numbers.
So let's put 10 in each blank slot.
10, 10, 10, 10, 10.
Therefore, the final answer would be 100,000. There are 100,000 possibilities of different U.S zip codes. Hope this answer helps.

5 0

2 years ago

The Wall Street Journal Corporate Perceptions Study 2011 surveyed readers and asked how each rated the Quality of Management and

natali 33 [55]

Answer:

a) $\chi^2 = \frac{(40-35)^2}{35}+\frac{(35-40)^2}{40}+\frac{(25-25)^2}{25}+\frac{(25-24.5)^2}{24.5}+\frac{(35-28)^2}{28}+\frac{(25-17.5)^2}{17.5}+\frac{(5-10.5)^2}{10.5}+\frac{(10-12)^2}{12}+\frac{(15-7.5)^2}{7.5} =17.03$

$p_v = P(\chi^2_{4} >17.03)=0.0019$

And we can find the p value using the following excel code:

"=1-CHISQ.DIST(17.03,4,TRUE)"

Since the p value is lower than the significance level we can reject the null hypothesis at 5% of significance, and we can conclude that we have association or dependence between the two variables.

P(E|Ex)= P(EΛEx )/ P(Ex) = (40/215)/ (70/215)= 40/70=0.5714

P(E|Gx)= P(EΛGx )/ P(Gx) = (35/215)/ (80/215)= 35/80=0.4375

P(E|Fx)= P(EΛFx )/ P(Fx) = (25/215)/ (50/215)= 25/50=0.5

P(G|Ex)= P(GΛEx )/ P(Ex) = (25/215)/ (70/215)= 25/70=0.357

P(G|Gx)= P(GΛGx )/ P(Gx) = (35/215)/ (80/215)= 35/80=0.4375

P(G|Fx)= P(GΛFx )/ P(Fx) = (10/215)/ (50/215)= 10/50=0.2

P(F|Ex)= P(FΛEx )/ P(Ex) = (5/215)/ (70/215)= 5/70=0.0714

P(F|Gx)= P(FΛGx )/ P(Gx) = (10/215)/ (80/215)= 10/80=0.125

P(F|Fx)= P(FΛFx )/ P(Fx) = (15/215)/ (50/215)= 15/50=0.3

And that's what we see here almost all the conditional probabilities are higher than 0.2 so then the conclusion of dependence between the two variables makes sense.

Step-by-step explanation:

A chi-square goodness of fit test "determines if a sample data matches a population".

A chi-square test for independence "compares two variables in a contingency table to see if they are related. In a more general sense, it tests to see whether distributions of categorical variables differ from each another".

Assume the following dataset:

Quality management Excellent Good Fair Total

Excellent 40 35 25 100

Good 25 35 10 70

Fair 5 10 15 30

Total 70 80 50 200

Part a

We need to conduct a chi square test in order to check the following hypothesis:

H0: There is independence between the two categorical variables

H1: There is association between the two categorical variables

The level of significance assumed for this case is $\alpha=0.05$

The statistic to check the hypothesis is given by:

$\chi^2 = \sum_{i=1}^n \frac{(O_i -E_i)^2}{E_i}$

The table given represent the observed values, we just need to calculate the expected values with the following formula $E_i = \frac{total col * total row}{grand total}$

And the calculations are given by:

$E_{1} =\frac{70*100}{200}=35$

$E_{2} =\frac{80*100}{200}=40$

$E_{3} =\frac{50*100}{200}=25$

$E_{4} =\frac{70*70}{200}=24.5$

$E_{5} =\frac{80*70}{200}=28$

$E_{6} =\frac{50*70}{200}=17.5$

$E_{7} =\frac{70*30}{200}=10.5$

$E_{8} =\frac{80*30}{200}=12$

$E_{9} =\frac{50*30}{200}=7.5$

And the expected values are given by:

Quality management Excellent Good Fair Total

Excellent 35 40 25 100

Good 24.5 28 17.5 85

Fair 10.5 12 7.5 30

Total 70 80 65 215

And now we can calculate the statistic:

$\chi^2 = \frac{(40-35)^2}{35}+\frac{(35-40)^2}{40}+\frac{(25-25)^2}{25}+\frac{(25-24.5)^2}{24.5}+\frac{(35-28)^2}{28}+\frac{(25-17.5)^2}{17.5}+\frac{(5-10.5)^2}{10.5}+\frac{(10-12)^2}{12}+\frac{(15-7.5)^2}{7.5} =17.03$

Now we can calculate the degrees of freedom for the statistic given by:

$df=(rows-1)(cols-1)=(3-1)(3-1)=4$

And we can calculate the p value given by:

$p_v = P(\chi^2_{4} >17.03)=0.0019$

And we can find the p value using the following excel code:

"=1-CHISQ.DIST(17.03,4,TRUE)"

Since the p value is lower than the significance level we can reject the null hypothesis at 5% of significance, and we can conclude that we have association or dependence between the two variables.

Part b

We can find the probabilities that Quality of Management and the Reputation of the Company would be the same like this:

Let's define some notation first.

E= Quality Management excellent Ex=Reputation of company excellent

G= Quality Management good Gx=Reputation of company good

F= Quality Management fait Ex=Reputation of company fair

P(EΛ Ex) =40/215=0.186

P(GΛ Gx) =35/215=0.163

P(FΛ Fx) =15/215=0.0697

If we have dependence then the conditional probabilities would be higher values.

P(E|Ex)= P(EΛEx )/ P(Ex) = (40/215)/ (70/215)= 40/70=0.5714

P(E|Gx)= P(EΛGx )/ P(Gx) = (35/215)/ (80/215)= 35/80=0.4375

P(E|Fx)= P(EΛFx )/ P(Fx) = (25/215)/ (50/215)= 25/50=0.5

P(G|Ex)= P(GΛEx )/ P(Ex) = (25/215)/ (70/215)= 25/70=0.357

P(G|Gx)= P(GΛGx )/ P(Gx) = (35/215)/ (80/215)= 35/80=0.4375

P(G|Fx)= P(GΛFx )/ P(Fx) = (10/215)/ (50/215)= 10/50=0.2

P(F|Ex)= P(FΛEx )/ P(Ex) = (5/215)/ (70/215)= 5/70=0.0714

P(F|Gx)= P(FΛGx )/ P(Gx) = (10/215)/ (80/215)= 10/80=0.125

P(F|Fx)= P(FΛFx )/ P(Fx) = (15/215)/ (50/215)= 15/50=0.3

And that's what we see here almost all the conditional probabilities are higher than 0.2 so then the conclusion of dependence between the two variables makes sense.

7 0

3 years ago