Answer:
Negetive
Step-by-step explanation:
It helps to re-write.
-6 + -6 is the same as -6 -6
-6 + -6 = - 12
It would be different if these were multiplied together, but AS WRITTEN, they are subtracted. If it was (-6)(-6) or -6(-6) that would indicate multiplication as well.
The answer is negative.
A) The average market price is (12 + 8 + 10 + 13 + 14 + 8) / 6 = $10.83
b)
The total amount spent was: 12*8 + 8*12 + 10*10 + 13*7 + 14*7 + 8*12 =
$577. The total number of shares was: 8 + 12 + 10 + 7 + 7 + 12 = 56.
Therefore the average price per share was $577 / 56 shares =
$10.30/share.
c) Since the cost per share in June was $12, and her average cost was $10.30, dollar-cost averaging worked in her favor since her average cost was lower.
Answer:
Note: The full question is attached as picture below
a) Hо : p = 0.71
Ha : p ≠ 0.71
<em>p </em>= x / n
<em>p </em>= 91/110
<em>p </em>= 0.83.
1 - Pо = 1 - 0.71 = 0.29.
b) Test statistic = z
= <em>p </em>- Pо / [√Pо * (1 - Pо ) / n]
= 0.83 - 0.71 / [√(0.71 * 0.29) / 110]
= 0.12 / 0.043265
= 2.77360453
Test statistic = 2.77
c) P-value
P(z > 2.77) = 2 * [1 - P(z < 2.77)] = 2 * 0.0028
P-value = 0.0056
∝ = 0.01
P-value < ∝
Reject the null hypothesis. There is sufficient evidence to support the researchers claim at the 1% significance level.
Answer:
i think it may be "A" but i may be wrong sorry if im wrong
Step-by-step explanation:
