Answer: C (not completely sure)
Explanation:
According to Wikipedia, seditious speech is "speech directed at the overthrow of government. It includes speech attacking basic institutions of government, including particular governmental leaders."
Due to this definition, answer C is the best. The others mention revolutions, which isn't the definition.
Answer:
b. social distinctions were more blurred than in europe.
Explanation:
<u>British taxes practically caused the revolution of the colonies</u>, therefore option "A" is not the correct answer.
That various religious and ethnic groups coexisted in the American colonies was no reason for colonists to tend to support British royalty (D).<em> In fact, diversity and immigration were one of the reasons why the thirteen colonies flourished so quickly.</em>
The colonists didn´t feel that British royalty did anything for them as they had to survive on their own, dedicating themselves mainly to agriculture. <u>The difference in wealth between the inhabitants of England and the colonists was very large, therefore the colonists did not feel entitled to the rights of English citizens (C). Not because the American colonies had a great diversity of religious and ethnic groups.</u>
Because the American colonies were home to diverse religious and ethnic groups, social distinctions were more blurred than in Europe (B). In New England, diversity was ironically the point in common that its inhabitants had and that would lead them to fight for their independence.
Answer:
The answer is realism.
Explanation:
As the paragraph says, realism attempts to represent a subject in a true, non-artifcial way. In other words, it avoids any unlikely or supernatural elements. It is also known as naturalism.
Although Gustave Courbet was seen as the leader of realism in his time, realism is arguably a matter of technique and not a period in art history.
Answer: NATURAL LAW.
Explanation: Natural law in philosophy can be said to be an ethical theory that posits the existence of a law whose content is set by nature and has validity everywhere.
The law of nature is implied to be objective and universal. In essence, it exists independently.
Humans instinct that inclines them to protect themselves from harm can be termed natural law. This is because, this act is VALID for every single human in the world and is OBJECTIVE. Validity and objectivity being the key words of natural laws.
