This question asks for an essay, which is a personal task that we cannot provide here. However, we can still develop some ideas that might help you in your work.
The House of Representatives can be considered both the people's branch and the insiders' branch. However, there is no question that the institution is now a lot more restrictive and less connected to the people than it was when the Framers designed it. Therefore, I would argue that it has become an insiders' branch.
First, legislators do not listen to constituents all the time. This is because each legislators has an enormous amount of constituents, all of which have very different characteristics. Moreover, legislators need to reconcile the interests of their constituents with those of other groups.
Second, the policymaking process makes it difficult for the public to monitor and evaluate the House. This is because common people do not have access to the necessary information to make this possible. Moreover, the process is long and complicated, and cannot be easily understood by all people.
Finally, partisan gerrymandering and polarization means that certain groups of constituents are much more important to a politician's career and support than others. This includes constituents in swing states, or constituents who support a particular party. Therefore, these constituents might see their interests represented more often than others.
The answer is physical symptoms <span />
Answer:
Explanation:The Allies described the wartime military alliance of Germany, Austria-Hungary, Bulgaria and the Ottoman Empire as the 'Central Powers'.
Answer:
Reliable but not valid
Explanation:
Validity and reliability are two concepts in research study that is used for evaluating the quality of a research. They show how well a test, or a method measures something. Reliability is a measure of how consistent the test or measure is, while validity measures the accuracy level of the test or measure. In the example above, the measure is reliable, because the consistency of the result is not in doubt here, what is in doubt is how accurate the measure us. Here the respondents are unwilling to report unhappy feelings because they dont want to be judged, hence validity will be questioned here.
Answer:
b.Carl Rogers.
Explanation:
Carl Rogers as the founder of a Humanist perspective on psychology, believed that each person has its own dignity, value, self direction not being directed by others. So Rogers could not have another attitude towards Lamont, but supporting the local pastor efforts on acceptance and respect even to that rebellious, inconsiderate and self centered man.
