After Mexico's defeat on the Mexican-American War (1846-1848), the Treaty of Guadalupe Hidalgo came into action. The U.S. was recquired to pay 15 million dollars as compensation for damages, while taking ownership of the territories of California, half of New Mexico, most of Arizona, Nevada, Utah and parts of Wyoming and Colorado.
Mexicans that were settled in these territories, had the choice to relocate within the new limits of their country, or stay and receive American citizenship with full civil rights. This had quite big implications in U.S. culture as it became more racially diverse. In the following censuses between 1850 and 1920 most annexed mexicans were counted as "white", but in reality, segregation only grew with time and continues to do so until this day, with mexican-native americans being considered foreigners almost universally. At the same time, mexican migration to these areas also continued to rise over the years, making the contrast bigger.
Politically, we can say Mexico wasn't in a bad position in terms of their negotiation power. The U.S. had shown itself hesitant to annex Mexico's territories and having deep domestic divisions in regards to the aims and justification for the expansion. However, the military power of the U.S. overshadowed all of that and their victory was definite. The treaty established a pattern of political inequality between the two countries, and this lopsided relationship has stalked Mexican-U.S. relations ever since.
Hope this helps!
Answer:
The Nullification Crisis was caused by the tariff acts imposed by the federal government. ... The 1828 Tariff Abominations increased the tariffs up to 50%, thus igniting the nullification crisis. Calhoun believed that the tariff system would bring poverty to the South as the southern states were agricultural in nature.
Explanation:
Here is some information to help you answer this question:
Reasons to vote for a 3rd party candidate
1) The person represents your views on society.
2) Show your displeasure with the two-party system. This is a powerful message to political officials. If thousands of individuals who feel left out of both the Democratic and Republican party vote for a third party candidate, it will shift the way politicians approach third-party candidates.
Reason why it would be considered a "waste"
If a third-party candidate has no chance of winning, some would consider it a waste. This is due to the fact that your vote could have been used to support a candidate with somewhat similar views who actually had a chance at winning.
