Answer:
d) 110; 180
Explanation:
Price ceilings is put in place to ensure a price does not rise above a particular level.
When a price ceiling is below the equilibrium price, the quantity demanded for will e greater than quantity supplied, and excess demand will arise.
original equilibrium of $12
180 units would be exchanged in a free market (when equilibrium price is $12), and 110 units would be exchanged with the price ceiling in effect.
Answer:
Yes, earning sensitivity will change in the long run
Explanation:
Earnings Sensitivity Analysis helps in determining the impact of an independent variable over a particular dependent variable based on various assumptions. This comparison on its own, measures changes in the long run.
This technique helps managers in determining the change in net interest income in correspondence to wide range of interest rates.
The repricing gap in the long term window will measure of the difference between the dollar value of assets that will reprice and the dollar value of liabilities that will reprice within a specific time period.
A possible implication is potential to receive a new interest rate.
The assets that could explain the positive reprising gap is Accounts payable and investments.
Two examples of Liabilities are: Short term loans and accounts payable.
Answer:
the annual financial advantage (disadvantage) for the company of eliminating this department is $18,500
Explanation:
the computation of the annual financial advantage (disadvantage) for the company of eliminating this department is as follows:
Annual financial Advantage (disadvantage) = $37000 - ($74000 - $18500)
= $37000 - $55,500
= $18,500
Hence, the annual financial advantage (disadvantage) for the company of eliminating this department is $18,500
Answer:
how do you want the answer to be
Explanation:
???
Answer: See explanation
Explanation:
1. Yes.
A design defect is when the design for a particular product brings about risk or injury which could have been averted if the design was done in another way.
With regard to the question, there is a design defect as we're informed that the drain cover becomes loose and we're further told that Sta-Rite did not install safety features on its drain pumps.
2. No.
Based on the scenario in the question, the ethical duty wasn't met by Sta-Rite Industries. They neglected the potential injury and harm that their design would cause. This means that they didn't perform their ethical duty well.
3. Yes.
In this case, Sta-Rite has to compensate the affected person and a punitive damage should further be added to whatever compensation had been put in place. This will serve as a way of making others also learn and always do the right thing and be safety conscious.
