1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
kumpel [21]
3 years ago
7

NEED HELP PLEASE ANSWER ASAP! (41)

Mathematics
2 answers:
Cerrena [4.2K]3 years ago
7 0

Answer:

(2)  x^2-3x-4=0

Step-by-step explanation:

Standard form of a quadratic equation:  ax^2+bx+c=0

When factoring a quadratic (finding the roots) we find two numbers that multiply to ac and sum to b, then rewrite b as the sum of these two numbers.

So if the roots <u>sum to 3</u> and <u>multiply to -4</u>, then the two numbers would be 4 and -1.

\implies b=1+-4=-3

\implies ac=1 \cdot -4

As there the leading coefficient is 1, c=-4.  

Therefore, the equation would be:  x^2-3x-4=0

<u>Proof</u>

Factor  x^2-3x-4=0

Find two numbers that multiply to ac and sum to b.

The two numbers that multiply to -4 and sum to -3 are:  -4 and 1.

Rewrite b as the sum of these two numbers:

\implies x^2-4x+x-4=0

Factorize the first two terms and the last two terms separately:

\implies x(x-4)+1(x-4)=0

Factor out the common term  (x-4):

\implies (x+1)(x-4)=0

Therefore, the roots are:  

(x+1)=0 \implies x=-1

(x-4)=0 \implies x=4

So the sum of the roots is:  -1 + 4 = 3

And the product of the roots is:  -1 × 4 = -4

Thereby proving that  x^2-3x-4=0  has roots whose sum is 3 and whose product is -4.

ExtremeBDS [4]3 years ago
3 0

Answer:

   41. <u>(2) x² - 3x - 4 =0</u>

Step-by-step explanation:

<u>Question 41</u>

<u>Standard form of polynomial</u>

  • x² - (sum of roots) + product of roots = 0
  • <u>(2) x² - 3x - 4 =0</u>
You might be interested in
Simplify the following, leaving your answer in index form- attached document.
boyakko [2]

HOPE THIS WILL HELP U FRIEND

5 0
3 years ago
What is 5.082 * 45 decomposed
swat32
72.3 is the correct answer because it is correcto
4 0
3 years ago
I REALLY NEED HELP ON THIS PLS HELP
Eva8 [605]

Part (a)

Answer: See the attached image below to see the filled out chart.

Note how rational and irrational numbers have nothing in common. This means there is no overlap. So they go in the rectangles. The two sets of numbers join up to form the entire set of real numbers.

Integers are in the set of rational numbers. This is because something like 7 is also 7/1; however 1/7 is not an integer. So not all rational numbers are integers. The larger purple circle is the set of integers.

The smaller blue circle is the set of whole numbers. The set of whole numbers is a subset of integers. Recall the set of whole numbers is {0,1,2,3,...} so we ignore the negative values only focusing on 0 and positive numbers that don't have any fractional values. In contrast, the set of integers is {..., -3, -2, -1, 0, 1, 2, 3, ...} here we do include the negatives.

============================================================

Part (b)

1) Some irrational numbers are integers.

This is false. An irrational number is not rational. The set of integers is contained entirely in the set of rational numbers.

---------------------------------

2) Some whole numbers are not irrational numbers.

This is false. The statement implies that some whole numbers are irrational, but the set of whole numbers is inside the set of rational numbers, which has no overlap with the irrationals. The statement should be "All whole numbers are not irrational numbers".

---------------------------------

3) All rational numbers are whole numbers.

This is false. A rational number like 1/3 is not a whole number.

---------------------------------

4) All integers are whole numbers

This is false. An integer like -44 is not a whole number because the set of whole numbers is {0,1,2,3,...} and we're not including negative values.

---------------------------------

In summary, all four statements for part (b) are false.

8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Work out m and c for the line: y = x + 4
OLEGan [10]

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

6 0
4 years ago
Find the standard deviation of the data, 12, 19, 9.
jek_recluse [69]

Answer:

4.19

Step-by-step explanation:

Find the mean:

\text{Mean}=\frac{12+19+9}{3}=\frac{40}{3}

Find the standard deviation:

\text{Standard Deviation}=\sqrt{\frac{(12-\frac{40}{3})^2+(19-\frac{40}{3})^2+(9-\frac{40}{3})^2}{3}}=\sqrt{\frac{158}{9}}\approx4.19

4 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • 59, 51, 55, 46, 50, 40, 44, ____, ____
    6·1 answer
  • Solve log x − 1 16 = 4.
    8·1 answer
  • Using the information given, select the statement that can deduce the line segments to be parallel. If there are none, then sele
    15·1 answer
  • If a polynomial function f(x) has roots 3+ 5 and 6, what
    8·1 answer
  • Helppppppppppppppppppppppppppppppppppppp
    12·1 answer
  • What is an equation of the line that passes through (0,8) and (4,0)
    5·1 answer
  • Answer asap thank you?!!!!!<br> 1.
    5·2 answers
  • Frank ate 2/8 of the apple pie and
    10·2 answers
  • Hcf or LCM
    8·1 answer
  • An orange cone has a exact volume of 120π ft³. What is the height of the cone if the radius is 6ft?
    11·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!