Answer: Washington was not in favor of political parties. He wanted it to be about the best candidatewinning rather than it being about two parties preventing all other parties from having a chance atbeing elected.Washington felt that political parties would be the down fall of our country. Hewrote a letter to the nation warning the people of the danger of political parties, and how theywould turn the government from a group of people interested in their nation's future to a powerhungry professional politicians
Explanation:
Answer:
Patriotism is a factor which establishes a more united community. Patriotism allows people to love other people of their country and help them flourish. Patriotism allows people to be united and help each other. As a result, national unity is achieved.
When people in a country remain united and take stand for each other, better communities and better citizens are produced. Patriotism is the factor which builds love and unity in a country.
Read more on Brainly.com - brainly.com/question/8305478#readmore
Explanation:
Answer:
Radiation
Explanation:
Energy from the sun is transferred through space and through the earth's ... Although you are surrounded by air, the air has nothing to do with this transfer of heat. ... radiation] It is infrared radiation that produce the warm feeling on our bodies. ... This type of heating is most commonly seen in the kitchen with a boiling liquid.
Answer:
The answer is stated below.
Explanation:
During the eighteenth century, women couldn't bring a lawsuit, she couldn't make a contract or own property. Women in any state were unable to vote or hold office, had no access to higher education, and were excluded from technical occupations. Law in the United States embraced the idea that a woman except her husband had no legal identity. With these backgrounds, picture raised their grievances against the domestic issues.
The correct answer to this open question is the following.
Argue a case for appointing judges and then argue a case for having them elected.
In the case of appointing judges, many experts agree on the idea that appointed is better because judges have to be neutral. They serve the Constitution, they do not serve any political party or particular interests.
Once appointed, the judges are going to ratify, so it is supposed that their integrity is double-checked.
In other cases, some arguments favor the election of judges, stating that people should be trusted to elect judges. Through this election, judges will be driven to serve the people who put their trust in them to impart justice.
If they are elected, some voices agree that judges should be elected for a determined period, so people could evaluate if they did a good during their tenure.
However, in both cases, some advantages and disadvantages have to be resolved by law experts and politicians in their respective states.
