One of the biggest reasons was that there were some revolutions that happened around the lat 19th century. They were primarily sparked by lower class individuals who were looking for more money to support themselves/families.
Answer:
No, economic opportunities can never outweigh the environmental damage because these two are interlinked with each other and degradation of one impact the other one in the same way
Explanation:
No, economic opportunities can never outweigh the environmental damage because these two are interlinked with each other and degradation of one impact the other one in the same way. Hence, if the environment is degraded for carrying out commercial activities, the economy will fall as there will be high pollution, increased consumption of non-renewable resources, global warming etc. that will require cost input for rectification thereby adversely affecting the economy.
I would say B) On a Cattle ranch. Ranching is a business whereby you are raising livestock.
Answer:
B) Japan
Explanation:
The pollution export hypothesis suggests the need for capital control and foreign trade operations. The economic policy implications of the Jones and Manuelli model suggest that developed countries such as Japan that are not able to establish efficient anti-pollution policies could benefit from international assistance that allows them to establish efficient control institutions. Finally, the equilibrium models discussed imply that any public policy that accelerates the transition from corner solutions to interior solutions would be beneficial for the environment. Normally, these public policies should be policies to promote economic growth and increase investments for the improvement of the environment.
