Answer:
Correct answer:
Explanation:
I am kinda sure its True
Hope this helps....
Have a nice day!!!!
Happy Halloween in advance, :D
Hello. You forgot to enter the answer options. The options are:
A. Most of the executives were secretly blue-collar workers.
B. Companies were careful never to violate American law.
C. Many times, when companies violated the law, it was unintentional.
D. Many times, when companies violated the law, it was intentional.
Answer:
D. Many times, when companies violated the law, it was intentional.
Explanation:
Edwin Sutherland was surprised to discover scenes of corruption and violation of laws within American industries. He was even more surprised when he discovered that these violations were done intensionally, promoting the benefit of entrepreneurs who had no commitment to order and honesty. These crimes are known as White Collar and are made by people who already live a wealthy life and without economic difficulties.
The renowned Greek general Pericles was the one that made the speech that said that If we took to the laws they afford equal justice to all in their private differences.
<h3>What is the meaning of this speech?</h3>
This is the speech that tells us that the law is supposed to have the same opportunities for all persons. That is no one had to be treated in a different manner by the law.
From the speech that this was given was the funeral oration that was given for the soldiers that fell in the Peloponnesian War. The goal of the speech was to persuade the people that were listening to him.
In the speech he had tp praise Athens as a way of helping to encourage them so that they would have to continue fighting in this war.
Read more on Pericles here:
brainly.com/question/894806
#SPJ1
Explanation:
it is a form of journalism in which reporters deeply investigate a single topic of interest such as serious crimes, political corruption, or corporate wrongdoing
Answer:
Yes
Explanation:
What the officers did was unconstitutional and violated the 4th amendment. Weeks v. United States established the Exclusionary Rule in 1914. At the time the exclusionary rule was only applied for federal courts instead of all courts. In 1949, Wolf v. Colorado, the High Court ruled that the Exclusionary Rule did not apply to the State but the Fourth Amendment did. In 1961, Mapp v. Ohio, the High Court ruled that the exclusionary rule applies to the state level as well as the federal. Justice Clark said this perfectly, "Thus the State, by admitting evidence unlawfully seized, serves to encourage disobedience to the Federal Constitution which it is bound to uphold....... Nothing can destroy a government more quickly than its failure to observe its own laws, or worse, its disregard of the charter of its own existence."