Answer:
Its probably A
Explanation:
I don't really think that any of those arguments are actually good. However, answer B is wrong because political parties won't necessarily lose financial support if somebody votes against them. it also doesn't really fit as an argument to why you should vote even though the other party will probably win. Number C is not logical because you don't just strt parties because the party you support loses. That way all the existing parties will lose votes and not only the ones you are against. Answer D is just a very bad argument. Think about, would you change where you proably live all your life just because they have more influence on the vote? What about your job, friends and family. And if they mean for you to fly or ride to another state just to vote and then come back, that bad too because it's expensive.
B. Nonviolent
MLK believed in non-violent protest and all of his rallies were free of physical violence (ex: lunch counter sit ins)
Answer:
I think it would be Aztec
Answer:
The Southern states were depended on the slavery system in culturally, socially, and economically.
Explanation:
The South economy based on plantation and slaves needed as labourers in cotton and other plantations. The Southern economy based on farming as the soil was favourable for growing crops like tobacco, cotton, and rice.
The Southern states depended on the labours to toil in the fields of cotton plantations. For plantation owners, slavery became the backbone of the economy of the South. Slaves worked as domestic servants in white colonists household as well as in plantations. The efficiency and productiveness in the South made most plantation owners economically dependent on slaves.
Slavery changed over time because it was as an evil practice by the Northerners in America. Slavery remained legal in the South, while it continued as illegal in the North. Slavery lasted until 1865 when the South lost the Civil War.
Answer:
Bogdan I, sau Bogdan Întemeietorul (în română: Bogdan Întemeietorul), a fost primul domnitor independent, sau voievod, al Moldovei în anii 1360. Inițial fusese voievodul sau șeful vlahilor din Maramureș în Regatul Ungariei. Bogdan și servitorii săi au părăsit Maramureșul în Moldova între 1359 și 1365. Moldova fusese sub stăpânirea lui Sas al Moldovei, vasal al lui Ludovic I al Ungariei, dar vlahii locali s-au opus suzeranității maghiare. Bogdan l-a alungat cu forta pe fiul lui Sas, Balc, si a pus mana pe tron. Ca răzbunare, Ludovic I a confiscat moșiile lui Bogdan în Maramureș în 1365. Bogdan a domnit ca prim voievod al Moldovei. Nu a acceptat domnia lui Ludovic I al Ungariei, transformând Moldova în al doilea principat român independent.
Explanation
