Answer:
Yes (It's more inefficient)
Explanation:
in ecology there are things called primary producers (plants) that are eaten by primary consumers (cows and chickens) and then there are humans, secondary consumers, that eat cows and chickens for energy.
The further we move from eating primary producers the more inefficient we become in consuming energy. Meaning, it requires a lot more natural energy consumption to support a human that lives on meat only as compared to a human that eats plants only. this inefficiency only magnifies when communities practice unsustainable food methods.
There are sustainable ways to eat meat, but (at least in the US) our current conventions of meat production are unsustainable and environmentally destructive.
Mendel was able to attribute the variation observed in the offspring of his experiment to the controlled fertilization process.
Mendel was able to control pollination and, thus, the fertilization process in the pea plants used for his experiment.
Mendel was able to effectively predict the outcome with self-pollination or cross-pollination with different results coming from each. Thus, he logically concluded that the variation observed in the offspring of his crosses is due to the fact that he controlled the fertilization process.
More on Mendel's experiments can be found here: brainly.com/question/3186121?referrer=searchResults
Type of symmetry in which body parts are arranged in a circle around a central point is called radial symmetry.
<span>
This type of symmetry is characteristic for the sessile animals like Cnidaria and Echinodermata. Organisms with radial symmetry have no left or right sides, they have a top and a bottom surface, or a front and a back.</span>
<span>epididymis is the answer your looking for</span>
False. Agribusiness is agriculture conducted on a large, commercial scale.
