1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
erastovalidia [21]
2 years ago
8

Mei Mei left her house at time zero and drove for 4 minutes to the store, at a speed of 2 blocks per minute. Then she stopped an

d went into the store for 5 minutes. From there, she drove in the same direction at a speed of 5 blocks per minute until she got to the bank, which is 10 blocks away from the store. She stopped at the bank for 2 minutes. Then she drove home at a speed of 3 blocks every minute. Make a graph of showing the number of blocks away from home that Mei Mei is xx minutes after she leaves her house, until she gets back home.
Mathematics
1 answer:
m_a_m_a [10]2 years ago
6 0

The graph for Mei Mei' trip is attached accordingly. Also attached are the  values derived from the question.

<h3>What is the explanation for the graph?</h3>

The secret to comprehending the graph is to understand that every time Mei Mei spent while she was on the way to bank and back were are all computed cumulatively.

This means that when she stops at the store which is 8 blocks away from home (that is 2 blocks per min x 4 mins = 8blocks) the time spent is recorded as 4 + 5 at location 8 blocks, which is equals 9 minutes.

Also take note of the fact that the time spent is plotted on the x-axis and the blocks away from home on the y-axis.

Learn more about graphs at:

brainly.com/question/25020119

#SPJ1

You might be interested in
Which is equivalent to 10(−225) ?
agasfer [191]

Answer:

2250.        hope this helps!

Step-by-step explanation:

Multiply  10 225

5 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Help me please!! I need this for my math test!!
Svetlanka [38]

Answer:

y=+3

Step-by-step explanation:

6 0
3 years ago
Kellie is given the following information:
Murljashka [212]

Answer:

She used inductive reasoning. (False)

She used the law of detachment.  (True)

Her conclusion is valid.  (True)

The statements can be represented as "if p, then q and if q, then r."  (False)

Her conclusion is true. (True)

Step-by-step explanation:

p = Two lines are perpendicular

q = They intersect at Right angles.

Given: A and B are perpendicular

Conclusion: A and B intersect at right angle.

According to the law of detachment, There are two premises (statements that are accepted as true) and a conclusion. They must follow the pattern as shown below.

Statement 1: If p, then q.

Statement 2: p

Conclusion: q

In our case the pattern is followed. The truth of the premises logically guarantees the truth of the conclusion. So her conclusion is true and valid.

3 0
3 years ago
Resale Value Garland Mills purchased a certain piece of machinery 2 years ago for $500,000. Its present resale value is $420,000
Natasha2012 [34]

Answer:

260,000

Step-by-step explanation:

The value decreases by 40,000 per year (500000-42000/2 years) the value will decrease by 240000 in six (4 years plus 2 years already passed) years. 6 x 40,000 =240000

So, the value should be 260,000 (500000-240000)

Or

year 1 500000-40000=460000

year 2 460000-40000=420000

year 3 420000-40000=380000

year 4 380000-40000=340000

year 5 340000-40000=300000

year 6 300000-40000=260000

6 0
3 years ago
The Oxy coordinate plane for two parallel lines a and a' has the equations 2x - 3y-1 = 0 and 2x - 3y + 5 = 0. respectively. Whic
Andru [333]

Answer:

Remember that a vector translation can be written as:

T(a, b)

And if we apply this to a random point, (x, y), the translation gives:

T(a, b)(x, y) = (x + a, y + b)

now, remember that a general line can be written as:

y = m*x + s

Then a point of that line can be written as: (x, m*x + s)

Then if we apply the translation to a point in the line, we get:

T(a, b)(x, m*x + s) = (x + a, m*x + s + b)

Here we have two lines:

2x - 3y - 1 = 0

2x - 3y + 5 = 0

First, let's rewrite both of these in the slope-intercept form:

y = (2/3)*x - 1/3

y = (2/3)*x + 5/3

Now let's assume that we apply a translation to the first line, that has points of the form (x,  (2/3)*x - 1/3), such that we want to get points of the form:

(x, (2/3)*x + 5/3).

Then we must have:

T(a, b)(x,  (2/3)*x - 1/3) = (x + a,  (2/3)*x - 1/3 + b) = (x, (2/3)*x + 5/3).

Then we need to solve:

(x + a,  (2/3)*x - 1/3 + b) = (x, (2/3)*x + 5/3).

This means that:

x + a = x

(2/3)*x - 1/3 + b = (2/3)*x + 5/3

From the first equation, we can see that a = 0

Now we can solve the second one to find the value of b.

(2/3)*x - 1/3 + b = (2/3)*x + 5/3

subtracting (2/3)*x in both sides, we get:

-1/3 + b = 5/3

b = 5/3 + 1/3

b = 6/3 = 2

b = 2

Then the vector translation is:

T(0, 2)

So it moves the whole line 2 units upwards.

7 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • What are the constant proportionality y=0.2x
    12·2 answers
  • The sum of a number and 4​
    15·1 answer
  • Please help it's due in a few minutes ASAP
    14·1 answer
  • I NEED Help Please Help
    10·1 answer
  • What is the domain of the ordered pairs shown in the graph?
    8·2 answers
  • How can you make 5/7% into a fraction?​
    9·2 answers
  • Consider the following sequence: -5, -1, 3,...
    5·1 answer
  • State the domain and range of the following function:
    14·1 answer
  • Solve the question below:
    11·2 answers
  • Item 2<br> Divide. Write your answer in simplest form.<br><br> −89÷(−89)
    9·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!