Hello,
The Selection committee for the exhibit was amazed to see such fine work done by a mere amateur.
Hope this helps !
Katherine's opportunity cost of attending the lecture is: the transportation and time cost of getting to the lecture event itself plus the reduction in her physics exam grade by not studying tonight.
<u>Explanation</u>:
The opportunity cost is the "cost" lost by not enjoying the benefit associated with the chosen alternative choice. People usually make use of opportunities to make themselves better.
The opportunity cost can be explained as giving up of profit or value to achieve something else. Opportunity cost is the value of giving up the best thing whenever you make a decision. When Katherine decided to attend the lecture of her favorite author, she lost her time, transportation cost and even scored low grade in physics exam as didn’t study on exam night.
The economic consequence which doesn't relate to obesity in this case would be D - the cost of services for chemotherapy. The amount of money that chemotherapy costs is largely unrelated to obesity levels either of the one who's giving it or the one who's receiving it.
Answer:
That statement is false
Explanation:
According to functionalist perspective, people need to fulfill their own role in order to ensure that the society run in harmony.
Between continuity theory and disengagement theory, only continuity theory is the one that aligned with the functionalist perspective.
Continuity theory views that older people will stick to the jobs/activities that they are used to while they are young. (so they can give contribution to the society), Disengagement theory on the other hand, views that older people will stray away from the job/activities that they are used to, making them no longer productive for society.
