Answer:
"Abnormality as the inability to function effectively"
Explanation:
An unemployed, homeless woman living on the street may be said to display abnormal behavior, even if she has chosen to live this way. Her inability to adapt to the requirements of society is what makes her "abnormal. The definition of abnormality that best explains this is "Abnormality as the inability to function effectively"
Behavior is abnormal when an individual is unable to adjust to the demands of society, such as getting a job or getting along with others.
Also, behavior is considered abnormal if it produces a sense of personal distress, anxiety, or guilt in an individual or if it is harmful to others in some way. According to this view of abnormality people who are unable to function effectively and adapt to the demands of society are considered abnormal.
Answer:
Using the cost-benefit analysis table to answer the question: should Mis. Baxter allow her students to take an open-book test the best option to fill the blank pace is: Mrs. Baxter may have to reteach the material.
Explanation:
First of all, let's analyze the context and the answers.
In this case, let's consider the first option. It doesn't matter if the students obtain better results if she instead applied a closed-book test. Increasing the notes the students would obtain wouldn't mean they learned the correct answer. But that they know how to find information. So it is the most logical considering the cost-benefit analysis.
The second option says that Mrs. Baxter wouldn't need to proctor the exam. But just because it is an open book test doesn't mean students won't feel insecure about their answers and won't copy from classmates, so it's wrong.
Parents may be happier with grades. This could be a good choice but may is such an ambiguous answer that doesn't say anything. It is a tricky answer we have a 50% chance they would be happier with nice grades, but if asked her the reason they wouldn't be happy. So, it's wrong because, in the end, she didn't test their knowledge.
Fourth option Parents will encourage children to study. They could provide them reinforcement for good performance but not encourage them. They would encourage them if they performed badly. Also if they knew how they obtained it, they would definitely know they were not tested and would have a reason to be rewarded. So it is also wrong.
Answer:
If John stops leaving his room in a mess in the future, then losing his wallet has functioned as a negative punishment.
Explanation:
- Punishment is taking something that someone likes from them in order to reduce instances of occurrence of a certain unwanted behavior.
- Negative punishment is therefore the occurrence of a disliked consequence as a result of an unwanted action.
- In the above instance, John losing his wallet is negative, but it achieves a consequent desired behavior of self organization.
True
<span>Elaborative rehearsal refers to the process of remembering
new information by linking it to previously learned information and making it meaningful in some way. </span>
<span>Using the mnemonic device “My Very Educated Mother Just Served Us Noodles” to recall the planets of the solar
system (Mars, Venus, Earth, Jupiter, Saturn, Uranus and Neptune) by taking the
first letter of each planet is an example of elaborative rehearsal. By linking the list of planets to other previously known
information, one is more likely to remember the list of planets.
Similarly, associating a newly met person's features with a previously known person's (your best friend's) features is an instance of elaborative rehearsal. </span>
<span />
<span>This is criticizing the speaker. This makes it difficult to effectively listen when the listener already knows that there is a fact or point that is going to be used against the speaker. In addition, by interrupting, the rest of the points that might be made by Sven are lost in her rebuttal.</span>
