Answer:
See explanation
Step-by-step explanation:
Given 
According to the order of the vertices,
- side AB in triangle ABC (the first and the second vertices) is congruent to side AD in triangle ADC (the first and the second vertices);
- side BC in triangle ABC (the second and the third vertices) is congruent to side DC in triangle ADC (the second and the third vertices);
- side AC in triangle ABC (the first and the third vertices) is congruent to side AC in triangle ADC (the first and the third vertices);
- angle BAC in triangle ABC is congruent to angle DAC in triangle ADC (the first vertex in each triangle is in the middle when naming the angles);
- angle ABC in triangle ABC is congruent to angle ADC in triangle ADC (the second vertex in each triangle is in the middle when naming the angles);
- angle BCA in triangle ABC is congruent to angle DCA in triangle ADC (the third vertex in each triangle is in the middle when naming the angles);
4x - 5y + 20 = 0
<u> - 20 - 20</u>
4x - 5y = -20
4x - 4x - 5y = -20 - 4x
-5y = -20 - 4x
<u>-5y</u> = <u>-4x - 20</u>
-5 -5
y = ⁴/₅x + 4
The slope would be ⁴/₅.
Answer:
110 degrees
Step-by-step explanation:
it is 110 degrees because on a line comebinedt is 180 degrees. And you already ahve one side which is 70 degrees. So 180 minus 70 is 110 degrees.
Short answer: you don't.
The linear term in the numerator of the integral means the form shown is not applicable. Rather, you perform the integration using partial fraction expansion.

The integral is ...
... (1/35)ln|5x-1| +(6/35)ln|5x+13| +C
_____
If the numerator of your integral were a constant, then the fractions multiplying the separate partial fraction integrals would have the same magnitude and opposite signs. You would end with the difference of logarithms, which could be expressed as the log of a ratio as shown in your problem statement.