i think its government regulations or possibly scarcity
Answer:
<em>According to ethical guidelines, at the end of a study participants must be fully informed as to the purpose of the study and given an explanation of any deception used in the study. This process is called </em><em><u>debriefing</u></em><em><u> </u></em>
Explanation:
<em>W</em><em>hat </em><em>is </em><em>debriefing</em><em>?</em><em> </em>
<em>Providing</em><em> </em><em>a </em><em>description</em><em> </em><em>of </em><em>the </em><em>experiment </em><em>and </em><em>it's </em><em>purposes</em><em> </em><em>in </em><em>order </em><em>to </em><em>minimize</em><em> </em><em>the </em><em>negative</em><em> </em><em>effects.</em><em> </em><em>[</em><em>if </em><em>any]</em><em> </em><em>an </em><em>experiment </em><em>may </em><em>have </em><em>on </em><em>its </em><em>subjects</em><em>.</em><em> </em>
Answer: Option D
Explanation: In simple words, estimating pitfall refers to the potential errors that may or may not occur in the future. These are human errors that are caused due to omissions, double recording or no recording etc. Such errors can result in the failure of the project.
Hence from the above we can conclude that the correct option is D.
Answer:
Net Present Value $ 23,373.49
Explanation:
First, we solve for the expected return:
![\left[\begin{array}{cccc}State&Return&Probability&Weight\\best-case&19,000&0.25&4,750\\base-case&12,000&0.5&6,000\\worst-case&-3,000&0.25&-750\\Total&&1&10,000\\\end{array}\right]](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=%5Cleft%5B%5Cbegin%7Barray%7D%7Bcccc%7DState%26Return%26Probability%26Weight%5C%5Cbest-case%2619%2C000%260.25%264%2C750%5C%5Cbase-case%2612%2C000%260.5%266%2C000%5C%5Cworst-case%26-3%2C000%260.25%26-750%5C%5CTotal%26%261%2610%2C000%5C%5C%5Cend%7Barray%7D%5Cright%5D)
Now, we solve for the present value of this vaue over the four-year period:
C 10,000.00
time 4
rate 0.12
PV $30,373.4935
<u>Last we subtract the investment cosT:</u>
30,373.49 - 7,000 = 23,373.49
