Ask question

Ask question

All categories

max2010maxim [7]

2 years ago

6

Bilbo signs a lease agreement for an apartment with Cato, who owns and manages the Deer Creek Apartments complex. These parties

have a. no contract. b. an express contract. c. an implied contract. d. a unilateral contract.

1 answer:

worty [1.4K]2 years ago

7 0

Answer:

C

Explanation:

an implied contract

You might be interested in

Action Shoes is a company that manufactures shoes. It has a lot of competitors in the market. However, it only builds its streng

shtirl [24]

Answer:

Nature of rivalry

Explanation:

In this context, rivalry represents a situation in which people, businesses, compete with each other for the same thing or market.

Action shoes has a lot of competition in the market, understanding the nature of rivalry implies that they know how to contend with their competitors.

Sometimes this may be called having or knowing your competitive advantage over your competitors.

7 0

4 years ago

The lazy-boy furniture company collects information about a wide variety of competitive, economic, political, legal and regulato

Sonja [21]

Environmental Scanning.

5 0

3 years ago

Marston acquired assets for $100,000. At the end of year 3, the assets had accumulated depreciation of $40,000. An impairment lo

MissTica

Answer:

(b)-Debit to loss on impairment of $12,000

Explanation:

As for the details in question,

The asset purchase price = $100,000

Accumulated depreciation = $40,000

Thus, book value = Purchase price - Accumulated depreciation = $100,000 - $40,000 = $60,000

Now, this has a fair market value = $48,000

Thus, loss of value to be recorded as impairment loss = $60,000 - $48,000 = $12,000

Since loss in value will decrease the value of asset, it will be debited against credit in fixed assets by $12,000

This, will represent book value = $48,000

Therefore, correct option is:

Statement B

7 0

3 years ago

Your company manufactures two models of speakers, the Ultra Mini and the Big Stack. Demand for each depends partly on the price

Kipish [7]

Answer:

p1 = $259.53 p2 = $381.20

Explanation:

1. Find the revenue function.

This is a typical income maximization problem. Therefore, the first thing we should know is what are the revenues for each product.

Recall that the revenue is given by P * Q

1.a Find the revenue of the Ultra Mini (product 1):

$R_{1} = P_{1} Q_{1}$

$R_{1} =P_{1} (100,000 - 200P_{1} + 10P_{2} )$

$R_{1} =100,000P_{1} -200P_{1} ^{2} +10P_{2}P_{1}$

1.b Find the revenue of the Big Stack (product 2):

$R_{2} = P_{2} Q_{2}$

$R_{2} =P_{2} (150,000 + 10P_{1} - 200P_{2} )$

$R_{2} = 150,000P_{1+2} +10P_{1}P_{2} -200P_{2}^{2}$

2. Find the marginal revenues.

The revenue function must be derived from the price.

For product 1, we derive from P1:

$MR_{1} = 100,000 -400P_{1} +10P_{2}$

For product 2, we derive from P2:

$MR_{2} = 150,000 + 10P_{1} - 400P_{2}$

3. Create a system of linear equations in two unknowns

With the marginal revenue functions we create a system of linear equations in two unknowns (p1 and p2) and equal 0.

$100,000 - 400P_{1} +10P_{2} = 0\\150,000 + 10P_{1} -400P_{2} = 0$

4. Resolve the previous system

4.a. To make it easier, we can rethink the terms of the system like this:

$100,000 - 400P_{1} +10P_{2} = 0$ is the same as saying:

$P_{2} = \frac{-100,000 + 400P_{1} }{10}$

And $150,000 + 10P_{1} -400P_{2} = 0$ is the same as saying:

$P_{2}=\frac{150,000+10P_{1} }{400}$

Therefore:

$\frac{-100,000 + 400P_{1} }{10} =\frac{150,000+10P_{1} }{400}$

Notice that now we only have one unknown (P1).

4.b. In order to eliminate fractionals, we can multiply both terms by 400:

$\frac{400}{10} (-100,000 + 400P_{1} ) = \frac{400}{400} (150,000 + 10P_{1} )$

$(40)(-100,000+400P_{1}) =150,000+10P_{1}$

$-4,000,000+16,000P_{1} =150,000+10P_{1}$

4.c. We solve the equation, putting numbers on one side and unknowns on the other:

$-4,000,000-150,000=10P_{1} -16,000P_{1}$

$-4,150,000=-15,990P_{1}$

$\frac{-4,150,000}{-15,990} =P_{1}$

$P_{1} = $ 259.53$

4.d. Once P1 has been identified, we replace it in any of the terms of the original system of equations (those established in 4.a).

$P_{2}= \frac{-100,000+400(259.53)}{10}$

$P_{2} = 381.20$

5 0

3 years ago

Korte Company reported the following information for 2014:

sergejj [24]

Answer: For 2014, Korte would report comprehensive income of $341,000.

Explanation:

Korte Company

Comprehensive income statement for 2014 (extract)

Sales revenue $1,500,000

Cost of goods sold (1,050,000)

Gross profit 450,000

Operating expenses (165,000)

<em>Other income:</em>

Unrealised gain on AFS securities 50,000

Dividends received 6,000

Comprehensive income $341,000

4 0

3 years ago