It is given in the question that
Point N(7, 4) is translated 5 units up.
And we have to find the coordinates of its image after this transformation.
Since the point translated up by 5 units, so the x coordinate remains same and we have to add 5 to y coordinate.
So the new coordinate after the transformation is
And that's the required coordinate after the given transformation .
Answer:
Higher
Step-by-step explanation:
1) In Macroeconomics, The core inflation rate does not include food and energy since these categories are way more volatile, due to oil and season matters. And statistically this measure looks for more robust items, to compose the core inflation in a more accurate way. The Consumer Prices Index (CPI) is the metric used for the cost of living.
Another Index, used by the Fed is the PCE, for the goods and services consumed by the US residents.
So, the Core inflation is based on CPI and PCE, <em>Personal Consumption Expenditure</em> therefore the inflation rate for the past year was higher than 4%, for it is not solely based on CPI index.
I just got this question. I think the answer is 5.
Answer:
Step-by-step explanation:
In the model
Log (salary) = B0 + B1LSAT +B2GPA +B3log(libvol) +B4log(cost)+B5 rank+u
The hypothesis that rank has no effect on log (salary) is H0:B5 = 0. The estimated equation (now with standard errors) is
Log (salary) = 8.34 + .0047 LSAT + .248 GPA + .095 log(libvol)
(0.53) (.0040) (.090) (.033)
+ .038 log(cost) – .0033 rank
(.032) (.0003)
n = 136, R2 = .842.
The t statistic on rank is –11(i.e. 0.0033/0.0003), which is very significant. If rank decreases by 10 (which is a move up for a law school), median starting salary is predicted to increase by about 3.3%.
(ii) LSAT is not statistically significant (t statistic ≈1.18) but GPA is very significance (t statistic ≈2.76). The test for joint significance is moot given that GPA is so significant, but for completeness the F statistic is about 9.95 (with 2 and 130 df) and p-value ≈.0001.
