One of the major advantage of the two-condition experiment has to do with interpreting the results of the study. Correct scientific methodology does not often allow an investigator to use previously acquired population data when conducting an experiment. For example, in the illustrative problem involving early speaking in children, we used a population mean value of 13.0 months. How do we really know the mean is 13.0 months? Suppose the figures were collected 3 to 5 years before performing the experiment. How do we know that infants haven’t changed over those years? And what about the conditions under which the population data were collected? Were they the same as in the experiment? Isn’t it possible that the people collecting the population data were not as motivated as the experimenter and, hence, were not as careful in collecting the data? Just how were the data collected? By being on hand at the moment that the child spoke the first word? Quite unlikely. The data probably were collected by asking parents when their children first spoke. How accurate, then, is the population mean?
Answer:
Yeah and i don't know how to answer that sorry
Step-by-step explanation:
you can't look it up some how?
Well to find the range, you need to take the highest number and subtract the lowest from it:
3 - -97
3 + 97
100
Range is always positive
plz mark me as brainliest if this helped :)
Answer:
A= 18
Step-by-step explanation:
To find the height, find the blocks inside the shape that is completely attached (they have to be in a straight vertical line). In this case, you can see that three vertical blocks in the middle of the shape is completely attached. That means your height is 3.
To find the width, look at the how many horizontal boxes make up the top. 6 block inside the shape corispond with 6 blocks on top of the shape, so the width is six.
Multiply 6 by 3 to get 18.
Answer:
D: y = 2x - 2
Step-by-step explanation:
1. 
= 2
2. y = 2x + b
3. Insert the points into the equation: 8 = 10 + b
4. b = -2
5. y = 2x - 2
