<h3>Answer:</h3>
Yes, ΔPʹQʹRʹ is a reflection of ΔPQR over the x-axis
<h3>Explanation:</h3>
The problem statement tells you the transformation is ...
... (x, y) → (x, -y)
Consider the two points (0, 1) and (0, -1). These points are chosen for your consideration because their y-coordinates have opposite signs—just like the points of the transformation above. They are equidistant from the x-axis, one above, and one below. Each is a <em>reflection</em> of the other across the x-axis.
Along with translation and rotation, <em>reflection</em> is a transformation that <em>does not change any distance or angle measures</em>. (That is why these transformations are all called "rigid" transformations: the size and shape of the transformed object do not change.)
An object that has the same length and angle measures before and after transformation <em>is congruent</em> to its transformed self.
So, ... ∆P'Q'R' is a reflection of ∆PQR over the x-axis, and is congruent to ∆PQR.
I think its 149/ 490. Not sure, but pretty confident. Hope this helps.
There are many solutions. infinite solutions at that. when you solve it it equals itself 2.5w+21= 2.5w+21 so that means all numbers would work as a solution.
Answer:
Draw a number line starting with -100, -95, -90, -85, -80, -75, -70, -65, -60, -55, -50, all the way to 0. Then put a point mark at where the -98 would be.
