Question

Oppositely charged objects attract each other. this attraction holds electrons in atoms and holds atoms to one another in many compounds. however, ernest rutherford’s model of the atom failed to explain why electrons were not pulled into the atomic nucleus by this attraction. what change to the atomic model helped solve the problem seen in rutherford’s model? bohr’s work with atomic spectra led him to say that the electrons were limited to existing in certain energy levels, like standing on the rungs of a ladder. bohr’s work with cathode rays led him to say that the electrons were located within the mass of positive material, like plums in a pudding. thomson’s work with cathode rays led him to say that the electrons were located within the mass of positive material, like plums in a pudding. thomson’s work with atomic spectra led him to say that the electrons were limited to existing in certain energy levels, like standing on the rungs of a ladder.

Answer 1

The Bohr model was able to explain the situations that were not explained by the  Ernest Rutherford’s model

What are atomic models?

The atomic models were put forward in order to describe the nature of the atom. All the atomic models fall short of a complete explanation of the nature of the atom.

The change that describes why Ernest Rutherford’s model of the atom failed to explain why electrons were not pulled into the atomic nucleus by this attraction is that Bohr’s work with atomic spectra led him to say that the electrons were limited to existing in certain energy levels, like standing on the rungs of a ladder.

Learn more about atomic models:brainly.com/question/9145431

#SPJ1