1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Fofino [41]
2 years ago
12

In court cases the ________ is the party that brings charges and the ________ is the party accused of a violation of the law.

Law
1 answer:
Vlad [161]2 years ago
5 0

In court cases, the Plaintiff is the party that brings charges and the Defendant is the party accused of a violation of the law. This is further explained below.

<h3>Who is Defendant?</h3>

Generally, Defendant is simply defined as the person or persons charged with a crime or violation of a legal code.

In conclusion, Defendants are accused of breaking the law, whereas Plaintiffs are the ones who file the accusations against them.

Read more about Defendant

brainly.com/question/12441773

#SPJ1

You might be interested in
criminal law recognizes that a defendant may not be responsible for a criminal act if his mental state was impaired by
irina1246 [14]
Bipolar depression disorder I believe
4 0
3 years ago
How do registration laws very among states
Slav-nsk [51]

Answer:

In the states and the District of Columbia, lawmakers last year considered more than 2,900 bills dealing with elections and voting, and enacted more than 350, according to a tally by the National Conference of State Legislatures.

The changes include deadlines for registration, pay for election workers and many other details. But the overarching story is that there are simultaneous pushes across the country to make it easier or harder to register and vote.

Explanation:

4 0
2 years ago
Liquidity is something of value that you own. True O False​
ahrayia [7]

I think its true I hope it is correct

3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
2. Ano ang time signature ng awiting
koban [17]
I am guessing the answer is number three if I am correct let me know
6 0
3 years ago
What’s the importance of Steagald v United States? And do you agree with the decision?
nlexa [21]

Answer:

The decision of the Supreme Court on Steagald v United States (1981) established that according to the Fourth Amendment, police officers can´t search for a suspect in a third party´s property without getting a search warrant first.

Explanation:

According to the Supreme Court, the search carried in the house of the petitioner, Gary Keith Steagald, which was conducted only with an arrest warrant for Ricky Lyons, and led to Steagald´s arrest, was a violation of the exclusionary rule stated in the Fourth Amendment that protects all citizens from illegal searches and seizures. I do agree with this decision because any effort to apprehend a suspect should never infringe nor his or a third party´s constitutional rights.

7 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Anyone else sick of these mask? (please no hate i'm just wonder and I do follow the rules)
    9·2 answers
  • PP'SPP'SPP'SPP'SPP'SPP'SPP'SPP'SPP'SPP'SPP'SPP'SPP'S
    14·1 answer
  • The first thing you do in vehicle check is to __
    14·1 answer
  • How does a judge become a part of the Supreme Court?
    7·2 answers
  • Why is it important to carefully document an interview? a. You can learn from the problems and successes during the interview b.
    10·1 answer
  • What is one of the main differences between a Roth IRA and a traditional IRA? A. They differ in the amount you can contribute at
    12·2 answers
  • What is the author's argument? A) Youth voting makes sense to the author. B) Everyone wants their voice and opinion to count. C)
    15·1 answer
  • 1. Using the equation for speed, compute the speed of each participant and was
    13·1 answer
  • How do i do this?
    11·1 answer
  • The name of the law that enforced prohibition was known as
    6·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!