1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Fofino [41]
2 years ago
12

In court cases the ________ is the party that brings charges and the ________ is the party accused of a violation of the law.

Law
1 answer:
Vlad [161]2 years ago
5 0

In court cases, the Plaintiff is the party that brings charges and the Defendant is the party accused of a violation of the law. This is further explained below.

<h3>Who is Defendant?</h3>

Generally, Defendant is simply defined as the person or persons charged with a crime or violation of a legal code.

In conclusion, Defendants are accused of breaking the law, whereas Plaintiffs are the ones who file the accusations against them.

Read more about Defendant

brainly.com/question/12441773

#SPJ1

You might be interested in
I NEED REAL ANSWER OF THIS I WILL MARK AS BRAINLIEST
ohaa [14]

Answer:

number 17 is d 18 is c and 16 a

7 0
3 years ago
An applicant for a mortgage prints her tax records from the previous years to
Phoenix [80]
Answer is B hope that helps
5 0
3 years ago
The work of private security personnel is analogous to law enforcement officers, which means: the work of both is exactly the sa
lesantik [10]

Answer:

The work of both is similar but the levels of legal authority are different and unequal

Explanation:

Took the quiz on edge

7 0
3 years ago
Ronald Rawls and Zabian Bailey were in an auto accident in Bridgeport, Connecticut. Bailey rear-ended Rawls at a stoplight. The
sveticcg [70]

Answer:

I think he can not . I believe that it has nothing to do that if for example  Bailey had a car insurance with Progressive, which means it is  supposed to provide additional insurance  when they are injured by someone who does not have adequate insurance to cover the full  damages. Bailey was negligent In the car accident. Bailey had failed to apply his brakes in time to avoid the collision, failed to turn his vehicle to avoid the collision, failed to keep his vehicle under control, and was inattentive to his surroundings.

Explanation:

3 0
3 years ago
Which of the following is NOT a useful vehicle feature from a security perspective? (Antiterrorism Scenario Training, Page 4)
Lyrx [107]

Answer i think it could be e

6 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • - The American Medical Association classifies alcohol as:
    14·1 answer
  • Explain the statement, "If we didn't
    13·1 answer
  • Courts can issue different opinions on the same case
    13·1 answer
  • 8) In general,
    6·1 answer
  • Why are women less likely to use excessive force than men?
    12·2 answers
  • If you need to park your vehicle beside a highway,
    5·2 answers
  • If your license is a must wear a correct of glass lenses you
    7·1 answer
  • BRAINLIEST !!
    6·1 answer
  • Help please please please please I will mark you branliest please
    14·1 answer
  • BRAINLIEST + 18 FOR CORRECT ANSWER
    13·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!