I’m almost completely sure it B
The Supreme Court treat gerrymandering issues in 2019 as it allowed prejudiced gerrymandering by ruling that judgments about it are beyond the reach of the bar.
<h3>Is gerrymandering is a major problem in the United States? </h3>
The United States Supreme Court has declared in Millerv. Johnson( 1995) that ethnical gerrymandering is a violation of indigenous rights and upheld opinions against redistricting that's deliberately cooked grounded on race. still, the Supreme Court has plodded when prejudiced gerrymandering occurs.
It allowed prejudiced gerrymandering by ruling that judgments about it are beyond the reach of the bar. The manipulation may correspond of" cracking"( lacing the voting power of the opposing party's sympathizers across numerous sections) or" packing"( concentrating the opposing party's voting power in one quarter to reduce their voting power in other sections). Gerrymandering can also be used to cover incumbents.
Learn further about the Supreme court here: https//brainly.com/question/18228641
#SPJ4
Answer: False
Explanation:
The statement that "Under the US structure and operation of government each state can make, enforce and intrepret its own laws even if the laws are inconsistent with another state's laws or federal law" is false.
Even though state governments have the right to prescribe certain policy on education, taxation, commerce etc, it should be noted that such laws should not contradict the federal laws.
According to the Constitution of the United States, the federal law is being regarded as the supreme law and no.other state can contradict what it says.
Answer:
Federal judges are judges who serve in a federal court. The term refers both to the Article III federal judges and to Article I federal judges, who serve as magistrate and bankruptcy judges, and in other Article III tribunals.
Federal judges are nominated by the president of the United States and confirmed by the Senate. The various steps to the process is given below:
- The president nominates an candidate for a judicial seat.
- The candidate fills out a questionnaire which is reviewed by the Senate Judiciary Committee.
- The <em>Senate Judiciary Committee </em>holds a hearing with the candidate, interviewing he or her about things like their judicial philosophy, past rulings or opinions, and ideas about certain areas of Law;
- As part of this process, the committee sends a blue slip to senators from the home state in which the judicial election was received, allowing them to indicate whether or not they approve of the candidate
4. After the hearing, the Senate Judiciary Committee will vote to approve or return the candidate;
- If approved, the candidate is voted on by the full Senate.
- If the Committee votes to return the candidate to the president, the president has the opportunity to re-nominate the individual.
5. The Senate holds a vote on the candidate.
- If the Senate confirms the nomination, the nominee receives a commission to serve a lifelong position as a Federal Judge.
- If the Senate does not confirm the nomination, that candidate does not become a judge.
Cheers!
