Cos 105 will also be -0.26
csc 105 = 1.03
Answer: we can’t see graphs but I can help you if you show me them
Step-by-step explanation:
Answer:
the slope of y=3x/7+4/7 is M=3 over 7
In the case above, Talib work is not correct as one need to first switch x and y before one can solve for y.
<h3>What is the variables about?</h3>
Note that:
y=-8x+4
y-4=-8x
(y-4)/-8=x
Since the independent variable x is known, one can switch the variable labels and thus it will be:
y=(x-4)/-8
f^-1(x)=(x-4)/-8
This can be written again as:
f^-1(x)=(4-x)/8 :P
Thus one can say No, as he forgot to switch the variable labels after solving for the independent variable.
In the case above, Talib work is not correct as one need to first switch x and y before one can solve for y.
See the first part of the question below
Talib is trying to find the inverse of the function to the right. His work appears beneath it. Is his work correct? Explain your answer.
Learn more about variable from
brainly.com/question/4063302
#SPJ1
Answer:
Here's what we know:
A = Lw (Area is length times width)
L = 2w + 6 (length is twice the width plus 6)
A = 140 (Area is 140 m2)
Plug in the variable values:
140 = w(2w + 6)
Distribute:
140 = 2w2 + 6w
Subtract 140:
2w2 + 6w - 140 = 0
Factor out a 2:
2(w2 + 3w - 70) = 0
Divide both sides by 2:
w2 + 3w - 70 = 0
(w + m)(w - n)
When we factor out the quadratic, we know it's going to be a +/- situation because the c value in the quadratic is negative, and the two numbers are going to be three away, the plus next to the 3 meaning that the larger number is going to be positive:
(w + 10)(w - 7) = 0
w = -10, 7
We can't have a negative length, so we can toss out the -10, leaving us with w = 7 meters.
L = 2 * 7 + 6
L = 14 + 6
L = 20
Check:
140 = 20 * 7
140 = 140