Answer: The situation is unconstitutional because it is defamation or libel
Explanation: The freedom of the press is guaranteed by the First Amendment of the American Constitution, which regulates all the rights and obligations of the media, including the press. This means that everyone has the right to freely report and write, and freely express their opinions without censorship. However, there are some limitations when it comes to press freedom. There are, among other things, the extent to which the journalist, i.e the writer of the article, can secure the protection of a confidential source, then also indecency. In this our case it is defamation which, when it comes to defamation in the press, calls libel. If Nancy wanted to make up a story about a politician she personally dislikes, then it is defamation. The First Amendment also does not guarantee the journalist the right to interfere personal feelings about the politician with professional writing in the newspaper. This means that if Nancy made up the story of a politician without real evidence of any wrongdoing, then it was defamation in the newspaper, therefore, libel.
Government regulation protects constitutional rights, safety, and fairness. Option A is correct.
A mixed economy:
protects private property
allows the free market and the laws of supply and demand to determine prices
allows the government to own key industries.
A mixed economy is defined as an economic system mixing elements of market economies with elements of planned economies, free markets with state interventionism, or private enterprise with public enterprise.
Answer:
Strengthen the obligations companies have to notify customers when their personal information has been exposed.
Explanation:
The Personal Data Notification & Protection Act of 2015 is a recent legislative proposal that is being considered as a means to strengthen the obligations companies have to notify customers when their personal information has been exposed. This was a measure to protect both public and private sectors from cyber criminals, when there was a spike of this type of attacks from, allegedly, North Korea.
Answer:
my guess is that texas is a part of USA and that there wanting to know whats going on in there country
Explanation:
Why did the United States want to annex Texas?
Mexico wanted to keep Texas, and Van Buren feared it would cause war. He also didn't want to add a new state to the Union that allowed slavery. People who wanted to annex Texas said it was the manifest destiny of the United States to spread from the Atlantic to the Pacific Ocean. ... Congress voted to annex Texas.
New Hampshire became the ninth state to approve the Constitution in June, but the key States of Virginia and New York were locked in bitter debates. Their failure to ratify would reduce the new union by two large, populated, wealthy states, and would geographically splinter it.
