When the opportunity cost associated with increasing the production of one good or service in terms of another is constant at every level of production, then the production possibility frontier is Linear.
Opportunity costs address the potential advantages that an individual, financial backer, or business passes up while picking one option over another. Since opportunity costs are inconspicuous by definition, they can be barely noticeable.
Opportunity Costs= Absolute Income - Monetary Benefit.
The Production Possibility Frontier (PPF) is a bend on a chart that shows the potential amounts that can be delivered for two items if both rely on a similarly limited asset for their production. The PPF is additionally alluded to as the creation probability bend.
To learn more about Production Possibility Frontier is linear.
brainly.com/question/22527871
#SPJ4
Answer:
a. $495.60
Explanation:
It is asking for the amount of FUTA
The FUTA rate is 6% but Niemann is paying their State taxes so it get's a discount for 5.4%
<em>His FUTA rate is then 0.6%</em>

82,600 x 0.06 = 495.6
Answer:
Disadvantage of Corporate Form of Organization:
d. Government regulation
Explanation:
In recent times, government regulation of businesses appears to be regarded as a disadvantage of the corporate form of organizations. Governments intervene and regulate corporate entities whenever they fail to be self-regulatory. But, the regulations may appear to be so much that the corporate form of organization now looks like a disadvantage. Given the many corporate scandals, collapses, and misapplications of resources by corporate entities that have become the order of the day, government regulation is very important. Without government regulation, many corporate bodies will not be acting in the public interest. This is more so with public entity corporate organizations with diverse stakeholders and corporate managers who act as if they were running their own autonomous governments.
Answer: See explanation
Explanation:
a. Calculate the productivity for navy and army contracts in units produced per labor hour.
Based on the information given, for the navy contract, the total man hours to make 3380 devices will be:
= 34 × 40 × 2
= 2720 hours
Therefore, the devices per man hour will be:
= 3380/2720
= 1.24 devices per labor hour.
For the army contract, the total man hours to make 7480 devices will be:
= 44 × 40 × 2
= 3520 hours
Therefore, the devices per labor hour will be:
= 7480/3520
= 2.125 devices per labor hour
b. On which contract were the workers more productive?
The workers were more productive on the Army contract as they produced more devices per labor hour.
<span>a) AD shifts left. since we would be spending more but not making more</span>