1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Alborosie
1 year ago
14

Which of the following are TRUE about the population and population dynamics?

Social Studies
1 answer:
Anastaziya [24]1 year ago
5 0
Number 3 is the true one
You might be interested in
What was the name of the plan that called for a majority of white males in each state to take the oath of loyalty and denied the
poizon [28]

The correct answer is the Wade-Davis Bill.

The Wade-Davis bill was a proposed alternative to Abraham Lincoln's 10-Percent Plan. The Wade-Davis Bill required that a majority of white males in states that seceded to pledge their loyalty and had strict restrictions on office holding.

7 0
3 years ago
The main ecological benefits of earth houses lie in their _______.
Gala2k [10]
B. Use of natural insulation
6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
In a paragraph of 4-7 sentences, explain the Great Compromise as if you were one of the patriots there in that time.
lions [1.4K]

July 16, 1987, began with a light breeze, a cloudless sky, and a spirit of celebration. On that day, 200 senators and representatives boarded a special train for a journey to Philadelphia to celebrate a singular congressional anniversary.

Exactly 200 years earlier, the framers of the U.S. Constitution, meeting at Independence Hall, had reached a supremely important agreement. Their so-called Great Compromise (or Connecticut Compromise in honor of its architects, Connecticut delegates Roger Sherman and Oliver Ellsworth) provided a dual system of congressional representation. In the House of Representatives each state would be assigned a number of seats in proportion to its population. In the Senate, all states would have the same number of seats. Today, we take this arrangement for granted; in the wilting-hot summer of 1787, it was a new idea.

In the weeks before July 16, 1787, the framers had made several important decisions about the Senate’s structure. They turned aside a proposal to have the House of Representatives elect senators from lists submitted by the individual state legislatures and agreed that those legislatures should elect their own senators.

By July 16, the convention had already set the minimum age for senators at 30 and the term length at six years, as opposed to 25 for House members, with two-year terms. James Madison explained that these distinctions, based on “the nature of the senatorial trust, which requires greater extent of information and stability of character,” would allow the Senate “to proceed with more coolness, with more system, and with more wisdom than the popular[ly elected] branch.”

The issue of representation, however, threatened to destroy the seven-week-old convention. Delegates from the large states believed that because their states contributed proportionally more to the nation’s financial and defensive resources, they should enjoy proportionally greater representation in the Senate as well as in the House. Small-state delegates demanded, with comparable intensity, that all states be equally represented in both houses. When Sherman proposed the compromise, Benjamin Franklin agreed that each state should have an equal vote in the Senate in all matters—except those involving money.

Over the Fourth of July holiday, delegates worked out a compromise plan that sidetracked Franklin’s proposal. On July 16, the convention adopted the Great Compromise by a heart-stopping margin of one vote. As the 1987 celebrants duly noted, without that vote, there would likely have been no Constitution.

6 0
2 years ago
If one person is unemployed it is a personal problem, but if ten million people are unemployed it is
masya89 [10]

Answer:

a world wide problem

Explanation:

this is honestly stupid but if that many people are unemployed than it will be on news and everything

4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
According to harold garfinkel and ethnomethodology, people tend to get upset when minor conventions of talk are not followed. hi
Oksi-84 [34.3K]
<span>The reason that people usually will be bothered by the absence of conventions of talk is that in our communication lies cultural similarities and differences. When we follow conventions of talk, we are following our cultural norms and this provides a level of comfort for those involved. When these are not followed, there is an uneasiness that comes with the unfamiliarity, and necessary assumptions about the meaning of the communication can not be made.</span>
3 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • A test’s statistical significance depends on power and probability. Please select the best answer from the choices provided T F
    5·2 answers
  • when we rely only on our individual experiences and perceptions to understand the world,we run what risk?
    5·1 answer
  • What is the difference between a republic and a dictatorship? explain please...
    9·1 answer
  • "the client scored low on extraversion and agreeableness but high on neuroticism. looks like schizoid personality disorder to me
    13·1 answer
  • What term means that all individuals have a designated supervisor to whom they report at the scene of the incident?
    5·1 answer
  • Schools provide _______ socialization through teacher modeling of behavior.
    11·2 answers
  • The decisions of courts, taken together, is referred to as
    7·1 answer
  • "The _____ may be explained by the fact that when making attributions about someone, the immediate environment is more stable an
    15·1 answer
  • Why do our senses respond most to changes in stimuli rather than ongoing stimuli
    6·1 answer
  • _________ is defined as a stimulus that follows a response and decreases the future probability of that response. punishment ext
    9·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!