Answer:
Modified Rebuy.
Explanation:
Modified Rebuy can be defined as the desires of a buyer to re-purchase or reorder the products previously bought but with certain modifications either in prices, products, suppliers, or terms. The buyer may modify the current purchasing terms because he may not be satisfied with the supplier or may have some new requirements.
In the given case, the modification in supplier has been made by the organization to get a better price. Thus this is an example of modified rebuy.
So, the correct answer is modified rebuy.
Answer:
The amount Lava should charge against income during year 4 is $63,000.
Explanation:
Since amortization is assumed to be recorded at the end of each year, this can be calculated as follows:
Annual amortization expense = Cost of the patent / Patent's estimated useful life = $90,000 / 10 = $9,000
Amortization expense recorded prior to year 4 = Annual amortization expense * 3 years = $9,000 * 3 = $27,000
Unamortized cost of patent charge against income during year 4 = Cost of the patent - Amortization expense recorded prior to year 4 = $90,000 - $27,000 = $63,000
Therefore, the amount Lava should charge against income during year 4 is $63,000.
Answer:
Contingencies are potential liabilities that might result because of a past event
Explanation:
Reasonably possible losses are only described in the notes and remote contingencies can be omitted entirely from financial statements.
Answer:
Entry to record adjustment:
COGS Dr $9.4m
Inventory Cr $9.4m
Explanation:
The question relates to a change in accounting policy. According to IAS 8 (changes in accounting policy and estimate), a change in accounting policy is to be reflected retrospectively and prospectively, which means any changes should be implemented by bringing changes in the past records. Since CPS company has been using FIFO method, the inventory has been overstated in the financial statements. A shift to AVCO has resulted in a decrease in inventory value.
The value of inventory has to be reduced as a result of change in accounting policy (i.e $38m - $28.6m). This is the closing inventory so a reduction in the value of closing inventory results in an increase in cost of goods sold (COGS), therefore, the adjusting entry will be aimed at reducing inventory and increasing cost of goods sold, see as follows:
Entry:
COGS Dr $9.4m
Inventory Cr $9.4m
I would go with D because it makes more sense
