Answer:
Daniel Chirot is a Sociologist and Professor of International Studies at the University of Washington, Seattle.
He argued that the recent worldwide increase in ethnic hostilities is a consequence of retribalization.
His context of retribalization means the tendency for groups to seek meaning and belongin in an ethnic group. There are macro and micro explanations for terrorism.
According to albert bandura, people who believe that their efforts will be successful and that they are in control of events have a high level of: Self-efficacy.
<h3>What is Self-efficacy?</h3>
Self-efficacy can be defined as the way in which a person tend to believe in their ability and skill to execute or achieve whatsoever they desire to achieve.
A person with self-efficacy personality tend to believe in themselves and their effort to achieve their set goals because they belief and have the confidence that they can achieve any thing they set to achieve.
Inconclusion according to albert bandura, people who believe that their efforts will be successful and that they are in control of events have a high level of: Self-efficacy.
Learn more about Self-efficacy here:brainly.com/question/1120411
Answer: Offender
Explanation:
Offender is the person is charged for committing any illegal act or crime in terms of law. A person who has violated the law and regulation of the nation is considered that he/she has performed an offensive act even if it is done against the will..
There are certain penalties and punishment for offender that breaks the law as per their crime. Punishment can include fine payment, jail, community device, death penalty etc.These punishments for offenders are decided by the court.
Answer: According to History ;
Pennsylvania
Pennsylvania quickly became America's most diverse colony.
Lenape Indians lived near the Delaware River. Dutch and Swedish settlers had farmed and traded in the region since the 1620s.
During the 1680s, other European settlers arrived at Penn's invitation.
Explanation:
Answer: Ultramares corporation v. Touche established Ultramares doctrine. Hochfelder v. Ernst & Ernst ruled that scienter is required before CPAs can be held liable.
Explanation:
All the options except the above are true. Ultramares corporation v. Touche did establish the Ultramares doctrine.
United States v. Natelli sentenced two CPAs to prison for a year, in addition to fines, for violating the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.
Bily v. Arthur Young did not uphold the restatement doctrine. The restatement doctrine restatement doctrine makes an auditor liable to people who rely on the quality of his work be they his clients or third parties. Two high courts ruled that auditors are not liable to third parties who use their work but only to the party that contracted their work.
However, Hochfelder v. Ernst & Ernst ruled that an allegation of scienter (an intention to deceive) is not required before CPAs can be held liable as long as the actions constitute actual deception.
While rule 10b-5 of the Exchange Act states the presence of scienter as a requirement to commit an offense, the court ruled against the statute by eliminating the Scienter clause from criminal statute and ruled against Ernst & Ernst.
