Answer: Budgeting helps to plan, coordinate , delegate responsibility and enhancing clarity in pursuit of an organisation.
Explanation: Every budgets is principally prepared to achieve a set target but there some limitations which makes it difficult for some companies to prepare and follow through with a budgeted plan action. Some of these limitations at any given point in time affect the activities of the organisation. It may be traced to Production capacity, shortage of labour, materials, space, Finance and customer demand. This limitation can at any point in time affect the overall plan of the organisation making it difficult to achieve their set target .
A settlement made with the aid of using a minor is frequently voidable, however a minor can most effective keep away from a settlement all through his or her minority popularity and for an inexpensive time after he reaches the age of majority. After an inexpensive length of time, the settlement is deemed to be ratified and cannot be avoided.
- Facts of the case: Sean, 17, a snowboarder, signs a long-term endorsement agreement for sportswear. At age 19, he wants to void the agreement by claiming that he lacked capacity when he signed the deal at 17.
- Rule of Law: Minor's Contracts are voidable at the option of Minor.
- Analysis: Since, Minor's Contract is voidable at the option of the Minor who Signs the Contact can either honor the contract or void the contract. A minor can void a contract for lack of capacity, only when he is still under the age of majority. If a minor turn 18 i.e., After attaining Majority and hasn't done anything to void the contract, then the contract can no longer be voided.
- Here, Sean has not done anything to void the contract on attaining the age of 18. So, he at the age of 19, cannot void the agreement by claiming that he lacked capacity when he signed the agreement at 17.
- Decision: Sean Vs. Sportswear Company: In the light of the above provisions, a Court will not permit Sean to now void the agreement.
Learn more about minority popularity here:
brainly.com/question/14457086
#SPJ4
The answer to this question is that it is an example of
regulatory capture.
<span>Regulatory capture is a situation where in the interest of
the business or firm is being prioritized by the firm in order for them to
advance and succeed. There are two types of regulatory capture; a materialistic
capture and non-materialistic capture.</span>
Answer:
The following are the answers to the question, using the FASB Acounting Standards Codification at the FASB website:
1. Topic 260, FASB Accounting Standards Codification is the topic number (Topic XXX) that provides the accounting for earnings per share.
2. FASB ASC 260-10-50-1
3. FASB ASC 260-10-50-2
Answer:
b. between $100 and $200
Explanation:
Producer surplus: The producer surplus is a difference between the willing price declared by the producers and the price the producers receives for supplying the goods and services.
In mathematically,
Producer surplus = Willing price - Receiving price
= $400 - $300
= $100
