I added a picture of a badly-drawn cross as an example to help me explain. Let's say h is the recessive allele, in this case, that would cause a recessive condition. The heterozygous Hh parent is the carrier and they are being crossed with a homozygous dominant HH parent.
As you can see, all of the children are either homozygous dominants HH or heterozygous carriers Hh. None of the children can be homozygous recessive hh because there is not a recessive allele h to inherit from the other parent. Because H is dominant over h, the recessive condition won't be displayed.
When quantity supplied is greater than quantity demand, the condition that needed for the price to reach equilibrium would be: The price of the product will decrease to meet equilibrium.
The Mississippi-Missouri, it’s is 6275 km
<span>This reflect "stereotyping and prejudice".</span>
In social psychology, the term stereotype<span> is any considered thinking regarding particular kinds of
people or certain methods for acting expected to speak for the whole gathering
of those people or practices overall. These convictions could possibly be right
or wrong as well like in this example Abdul’s qualifications are set aside and
a stereotyping has come up about women being treated unfairly in Muslim societies.
</span>
People are often enrage in different kinds of research. The collecting DNA is said to be okay only due to some specific circumstances (<u>probable cause</u>).
<h3>Is collecting DNA the right thing to do?</h3>
The 4th amendment is known to be against the violations of privacy and also it was stated of all ethical implications when using DNA analysis to solve crimes.
In the case of Maryland vs. King, it was sated that its ok to collect DNA evidence only when there is <u>probable cause</u>. for the said crime
The DNA Fingerprint Act of 2005 stated that all adult that were arrested for a federal crime will have to give a DNA sample.
Learn more about DNA from
brainly.com/question/16099437
