He was saying that the sun is in the middle of the solar system and the church was saying the earth was in the center. This means that the church was lying to the people and this meant that he was challenging the church and tradition . they resolved thus by having him excommunicated
Answer:
c. influenced its neighbors mostly through cultural and economic diffusion
Explanation:
Teotihuacan is a city-state that existed in a sub-valley of the Valley of Mexico. It existed from around 150 BC, until the 7th or 8th century, though the end of this civilization is not really known. It was the biggest city in the Americas in its time, and one of the biggest cities in the world, having more then 125,000 inhabitants. This civilization was not a war-like one, but instead it seems to used diplomacy, knowledge, culture, trade, in order to be in good relations with the other civilizations and to prosper. The ethnicity of the inhabitants is not known, and it is believed that people of few different ethnic groups actually lived together. The city is known for its monumental buildings, as well as the cultural influence that it had in the region, especially with the Maya and Aztec civilizations.
Southerners were critical of the North and believed that the North's wage labor system was a bad system that they had no interest in putting into place in the south. The southern economy was based on slave labor and southerners wanted to continue the practice of slavery and prevent any transition away from this.
Answer:
The main difference between Federalists and Anti-Federalists at the time of the ratification of the Constitution of the United States was in the powers that the federal government would have compared to those of the states.
Thus, the Federalists defended the idea of a strong and comprehensive federal government, as described in the articles of the Constitution. In turn, the Anti-Federalists feared that this strong government could trample on the rights of citizens and state governments, thus fighting for the adoption of amendments that would guarantee these rights: the Bill of Rights.
Therefore, all writing that promoted a broad federal government and with great prerogatives would be Federalist, while all writing that defended the rights and powers of the states in particular would be Anti-Federalist.
