Increasing numbers of people no longer view the safety of their neighbor- hoods as the sole responsibility of the police. Throughout the world, citizens in areas plagued by crime and violence are uniting to work with local gov- ernment. Together, they have the knowledge and resources to identify and remove the sources of crime, drug use, and juvenile delinquency in their communities.
Developing and sustaining these partnerships requires strong local leadership from mayors, city managers, city planners, and other elected local officials. This monograph was prepared to help create that leadership by chronicling how local public officials have used community safety partnerships to build healthier communities.
A framework for using community-local government partnerships to reduce crime now exists based on the experiences of public officials in North America, Europe, Africa, and Australasia. This framework includes the following:
• Recognizing crime and safety as a quality-of-life issue.
• Working across jurisdictional boundaries.
• Recognizing the crucial role of political leadership.
• Developing tools and measures of success that involve the community and victims of crime.
The programs examined in this monograph illustrate that this framework works best when adapted to the specific needs of a community. Good gover- nance requires that mayors and other key local officials develop the capaci-
Answer:
Representative democracy
Explanation
Democracy can be divided into two:
- Direct democracy.
In this form of democracy, the citizens can influence the decisions made by the government by directly vote for the type of legislations that the government can pass. This form of democracy typically used in small communities that rarely face overly complicated issues.
- Representatives Democracy.
In this form of democracy, citizens canto vote for the legislations. But, they can select a group of officials in order to vote for the legislations on the citizens' behalf. This system democracy is what currently used the most in the world. Typically, this form of democracy is more efficient in a society with large populations with a lot of complicated issues (such as a country)
Answer: D) Segmental level, projection level, precommand level
Explanation: The hierarchical organisation of the motor control system is only one aspect, besides it there is a parallel one. The motor control system is responsible for regulating movement and as such is crucial for the body's motility, which includes directional movement and reflexes. Of course, motor control only exists in organisms that have a nervous system.
As for the hierarchy of the motor control system, the lowest in the hierarchy is the segmental level. It consists of reflexes and parts of the nervous system in charge of automatic movements.
Second in the hierarchy from the lowest to the highest is the projection level and helps in the functioning of the segmental level, i.e, for the regulation of reflexes and for monitoring the multi neuronal system.
The highest level is the precommand level, which is responsible for controlling the output impulses that control the finest, most precise movements of the body, responsible for starting and stopping movements, regulating the muscles, and preventing unwanted movements.
A is the answer to this question.
Nullification, in United States constitutional history, is a legal theory that a state has the right to nullify, or invalidate, any federal law which that state has deemed unconstitutional. So the best answer among the following choices is letter C. Southern senator Calhoun and Hayne argued that Congress could not pass laws that favored one region of the country over another.
