Answer:
b. Horizontal merger.
Explanation:
Project Repat is merging with a company that produces similar products to its own markets them in similar markets as well, this is an example of a horizontal merger that results in increased synergies between the similar firms and a greater market share opportunity.
Vertical mergers are usually not in the same industry. They would either be with the suppliers of Project Repat or customers who retail Project Repat's products.
Conglomerate is an example of diversification and usually the merging firms have different operations.
There are no information of clashes of any sort within the two merging companies so it is uncertain whether this is a hostile takeover.
Hope that helps.
Jdhdhdhdjsuushdbdbdbudufjrjifufjfjfkfkfkididududjejdjdjfkkfjfjrufifiir
Answer:
Real Estate-Related Investments.
Explanation:
Real estate related investments involves the purchase, management, renting and sale of real estate properties with the aim of making profit.
Real estate investment is capital intensive and has low liquidity compared to other forms of investment.
This will be a good option for the conservative investor because real estate investment is stable and not prone to huge losses that can be incurred in the money markets. Also real estate is not affected by equities market. So will be a safety net in case of failure in the equity market.
Answer:
Explanation:
Porter's generic strategies determine how the company will gain competitive advantage within the selected market. Lower cost, differentiated or focus strategies could be included. The company chooses one of the two types of competitive advantages either by lower costs than competition or by differentiating between customers' value to achieve higher prices. A company also chooses two types of products that offer its products to selected market segments or industry levels and offer products in many market segments. The generic strategy reflects the choices made by both the type and the degree of competitive advantage.
1)Cost Leadership Strategy: This generic strategy requires you to be the cheapest producer in an industry for a certain level of quality. The firm sells its products at a price higher than its competitors or below average industry prices to gain market share. In the case of price war, the firm may gain some profit while suffering from competition. Even if there is no price war, firms that can produce cheaper in the time of industry growth and falling prices will remain profitable for longer. Cost leadership strategies generally target the wider market.
Each common strategy has risks, including low cost strategies. For example, other firms may also reduce costs. As technology develops, competition can increase production power and thus eliminate competitive advantage. In addition, many companies that implement a focus strategy and target different narrow markets may earn less in their segments and gain significant market share as a group.
2)The differentiation strategy requires the development of a unique product or service for its customers and offers unique features that recognize whether customers are better or different than their competitors. The added value of the product with the uniqueness of the product may allow the company to earn a premium for the product. The risks associated with differentiation strategies include imitating competitors and changing customer tastes. In addition, different firms that implement focus strategies can achieve greater diversity in market segments.
3) Focus strategies are focused on a narrow segment and seeks to achieve cost advantage or differentiation in that segment. The main pillar is better service, focusing on the needs of the group. Using a focus strategy, the firm often has high customer loyalty, which prevents other firms from competing directly. There are some risks, such as imitating focus strategies and making changes to your target segments. In addition, it can be quite easy for a broad market value leader to adapt products directly to the competition. Finally, other focus areas can create sub-segments where they can better serve.
Answer:
40%
Explanation:
the percentage change in price using the midpoint method = {(P₂ - P₁) / [(P₂ + P₁)/2]} x 100
= {($6- $4) / [($6 + $4)/2]} x 100 = [$2 / ($10 / 2)] x 100 = ($2 / $5) x 100 = 0.4 x 100 = 40%
The advantage of using the midpoint method for calculating percentage changes is that it doesn't matter if the change is positive or negative, e.g. it will yield the same result if the price increases or decreases in the same amounts.
