Answer:
angle 1= 104 angle 2= 76
Step-by-step explanation:
angle 1 equals x+66 and angle 2 equals 2x so you set up an equation where they are the sum of 180 degrees because the angles are supplementry angles.
x+66+2x=180 set the sum of the angles to 180
3x+66=180 combind like terms
3x=144 subract 66 from both sides
x=38 divide 3 from both sides
Now you put x back into the measurments
angle 1= (x+66) angle 2= 2x
(38+66) 2×38
angle 1= 104 angle 2= 76
Or after you know angle 1 you can subtract angle 1 from 180 to get angle 2.
Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:
Height of the Rectangle
Width of the Rectangle
Area of the Rectangle = Height X Width

The area of the rectangle is 
Answer:
There is no solution for this set of equations.
The sum of two numbers can not have two different solutions.
Answer:
Given - Radius of ring is 9 millimeters
To find - Circumference
Solution -
9 millimeters = 0.9 centimeters
Circumference of circle = 2 × pie × r
= 2 × 3.14 × 0.9
= 6.28 × 0.9
= 5.652
Answer:
<h2>Kelly is wrong, with this congruent parts, we can conclude that triangles are congruent.</h2>
Step-by-step explanation:
To demonstrate congruent triangles, we need to use the proper postulates. There are at least 5 postulates we can use.
- Angle-Angle-Side Theorem (AAS theorem).
- Hypotenuse-Leg Theorem (HL theorem).
- Side-Side-Side Postulate (SSS postulate).
- Angle-Side-Angle Postulate (ASA postulate).
- Side-Angle-Side Postulate (SAS postulate).
In this case, Kelly SAS postulate, because the corresponding sides-angles-sides are congruent, i.e., KL ≅ MN and LM ≅ KN, also, all corresponding angles are congruent.
So, as you can see, only using SAS postulate, the congruency can be demonstrated. (Refer to the image attached to see an example of SAS postulate)