Answer:
The exclusionary rule prevents the government from using most evidence gathered in violation of the United States Constitution. The decision in Mapp v. Ohio established that the exclusionary rule applies to evidence gained from an unreasonable search or seizure in violation of the Fourth Amendment. The decision in Miranda v. Arizona established that the exclusionary rule applies to improperly elicited self-incriminatory statements gathered in violation of the Fifth Amendment, and to evidence gained in situations where the government violated the defendant's Sixth Amendment right to counsel. However, the rule does not apply in civil cases, including deportation hearings. See INS v. Lopez-Mendoza.
Answer: Reports to only one ICS supervisor
Explanation:
The National Incident Management System (NIMS) helps in guiding the government, agencies and private sector organizations to work together in order to prevent incidents, mitigate the incidents and also respond to the incidents and recover from them.
According to the NIMS Management Characteristic of Chain of Command and Unity of Command, each person reports to only one ICS supervisor
this is an <u><em>opinion</em></u> because some people may think there's <em><u>not</u></em> too much standardized testing in schools. then some people might think <em><u>there is</u></em> too much. it all depends on who you ask and what their opinion is.
<em>-ari.</em>
Answer:
In the United States, one "standard" drink (or one alcoholic drink equivalent) contains roughly 14 grams of pure alcohol, which is found in: 12 ounces of regular beer, which is usually about 5% alcohol. 5 ounces of wine, which is typically about 12% alcohol. 1.5 ounces of distilled spirits, which is about 40% alcohol.
Explanation:
The method of delivering a chemical is called Dispersion
