1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
chubhunter [2.5K]
1 year ago
12

Marijuana in its herbal form, is a psychoactive product of the plant Cannabis sativa. true or false

Law
1 answer:
natali 33 [55]1 year ago
3 0

The statement" Marijuana in its herbal form, is a psychoactive product of the plant Cannabis sativa" is true.

<h3>What is Marijuana?</h3>

Marijuana which is also known as weed  is a cannabis plant that can be harmful to the body.

Some of the side effect of Marijuana are:

  • It can increases in heart rate
  • It can cause drowsiness
  • It can lead to gastrointestinal disturbances etc.

Therefore the statement is True.


Learn more about Marijuana here:brainly.com/question/8354517

#SPJ1

You might be interested in
3. While seem by some as a way to get rich, the
Marizza181 [45]
I would check all of them they all do
6 0
2 years ago
Which term refers to an institution created by a society to enforce public policies?
Savatey [412]

Answer:

Government

Explanation:

Democracies have something called the "consent of the governed" where the people trust the Government (institution) to create and enforce public policies as approved by the people.

Hope this helps! :)

7 0
2 years ago
If you were a member of the Supreme Court what law would you rule as unconstitutional? What basis would you use to support your
Vsevolod [243]

Answer:

Explanation:

The def: not in accordance with a political constitution, especially the US Constitution, or with procedural rules. Ex." we cannot tolerate unconstitutional action" Declaring laws constitutional or un unconstitutional is done by the deciding in the Judicial Branch of government.

However, governments do not just create laws. Governments also enforce the laws set forth in the document defining the government—in the Constitution. In the United States, the failure to seat duly elected representatives of the people following a proper election, or the failure to provide for such elections would be unconstitutional even in the absence of any legislated laws whatsoever.

When the proper court determines that a legislative act (a law) conflicts with the constitution, it finds that law unconstitutional and declares it void in whole or in part. This is called judicial review. The portion of the law declared void is considered struck down, or the entire statute is considered struck from the statute books.

Depending on the type of legal system, a statute may be declared unconstitutional by any court, or only by special Constitutional courts with authority to rule on the validity of a statute. In some countries, the legislature may create any law for any purpose, and there is no provision for courts to declare a law unconstitutional. This can occur either because the country has no codified constitution that laws must conform to (e.g., the United Kingdom and New Zealand) or because the constitution is codified but no court has the authority to strike down laws on the basis of it (e.g., the Netherlands and Switzerland).

7 0
3 years ago
How might we use criminological theory in our roles in law enforcement, the courts, or corrections?
ipn [44]

Answer:   Well, Im not in law school or college but Criminology is just like Psycology. Take a first-time killer for example, which after each murder (strangulation for example) puts the Lucifer pentagram on the body of each victim. The way the person was killed is the MMO. Motives, Means, and Opportunity. the way they killed the person, that will be their 'signature'. If a new victim comes up with the same signature and mmo, that will rank the murderer a serial killer. many people kill because they dislike the person, or are mentally ill. in the line of duty like fbi and homicide detective, they always try to understand exactly why the person did this. was it revenge? robbery gone wrong? copycat serial killer? (copycating is where you take a serial killer from the past and recreate their signature and mmo. if that serial killer isnt already dead or in prison, it might be thought that person has come back). all of this comes down to one word:

<h2>profiling </h2>

since criminology is just the basic study of criminals and people and to why they do things, it will always be used in law enforcement and first responders.

i hope this helped!

4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Locke’s purpose in examining the “state of Nature”is
NNADVOKAT [17]

Answer:

D)To show why the state of nature is inadequate for determining what our fundamental rights should be.

Explanation:

John Locke, an English philosopher, widely referred to as Father of Liberalism, examines the "State of Nature" for the purpose of showing why the state of nature is inadequate for determining what our fundamental rights should be.

According to him, each individual in a society has a natural right to protect his or her own life, liberty, and property and at the same time, each individual has a natural right to seek for compensation for any wrongful injury to his or her natural rights; life, liberty, or property which has been inflicted by other individuals.

However, Locke, believed that, since 'state of nature' is more or less a state of insecurity, that is, each individual is not secured to possible infringement of his or her natural rights by other individuals. Hence, the needs to create a civil government, whose purpose is to protect the natural rights, freedom and well-being of all members of society.

This is because, in a "state of nature" there is no legislative or judicial authority that members of the society can seek for help in order to protect their natural rights, such as lives, liberty, or property. But to ensure there is security and protection to individuals natural right, there is need for a civil government, with a judicial authority whose purpose is to resolve disputes fairly and equitably.

7 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • The Probable Cause Panel of FREC acts as a grand jury. They determine if there is a law violation or not and they recommend whet
    15·1 answer
  • Why do you have a name?
    12·2 answers
  • Elliot has misrepresented himself by acting in the capacity of a real estate salesperson without being licensed by the State of
    5·1 answer
  • Which of the following is something that both Bentham abd Mill would endorse
    9·1 answer
  • Match the Constitutional principle with an example of that principle.
    5·1 answer
  • Which of the following statement is true? a) Consideration need not be any particular value. b) Consideration should accord the
    15·1 answer
  • Determine if the statement is true or false.
    12·1 answer
  • Do you agree that incarceration is a better method of correction than corporal punishment?
    11·2 answers
  • Compare and contrast enumerated and implied powers in TWO paragraphs describing the similarities and differences between these t
    15·1 answer
  • What court system was the cunningham v. Enterprise rent-a-car company case tried in?.
    11·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!