If the results of a experiment do not support the hypothesis this does not necessarily mean that the experiment was a failure or that the hypothesis was wrong, but simply that the test that was conducted did not find results that were significant and also showed that the "null hypothesis" was incorrect. Therefore, if a hypothesis is shown to be inaccurate by a particular experiment the issue might need further experimentation because it could be wrong or it could not, but this does not mean the experiment was a failure. In fact proving a hypothesis can be informative for conducting further experiments to conclude what caused the phenomena if not the original hypothesis.
Answer:
2nd one
Explanation:
i don't know what the last option is for, 3rd one is 3rd person or omnipresent authour, 1st one makes no sense
Answer:
B) proactive interference
Explanation:
proactive interference is tendency of previous learning to interrupt current learning.
since here, varian's previous learning of Latin is making him difficult to grasp Greek. It can be well explained by proactive interference.
motivated forgetting happens when people try to forget certain things which they find irrelevant either unconsciously or consciously
proactive interference is phenomenon in which current learning hinders the learning of previous learnt knowledge.
temporary amnesia also known as transient amnesia is phenomenon in which a person losses memory before, during and after sometime of the event(the particular event which one is not able to remember).
Answer:
Bronze age
Explanation:
This may or may not be the answer but I do know the bronze age was somewhat renowned for technology advancments
I think you forgot the options, but i can give you some information that might be useful: the two are independent, but still, the federal courts can decide whether the state courts took their decisions according to the constitution.
