Answer:
1. In<u>ductive argument</u>.
2. <u>Inductive argument.</u>
3. <u>Deductve argument.</u>
Explanation:
1. This argument is inductive. The conclusion is a generalization, that is drawn by a premise, the premise has been obtained out of experimentation.
If two grains of sand have diamons, it doesn´t mean the entire beach is made of them. This argument is not strong because the conclusion is not accurate.
2. This is a deductive argument. This type of argument depends on the logic struture of it. If the premise were to be true, the conclusion would be true also.
It is not a sound argument, because thanksgiving happends every fourth thursday of november. It is an invalid argument because the premise is false, there for the concusion is false.
3. This is an invalid deductive argument. The premise is incorrect, so the conclusion that is being deduce from it is also wrong. It is not a sound argument because if you double the length of the sides of a square, the area would quatriple.
A Maya city from the Classic Period usually consisted of a series of stepped platforms topped by masonry structures, ranging from great temple-pyramids and palaces to individual house mounds. These structures were in turn arranged around broad plazas or courtyards.
Within the first stage of team development, called <u>forming</u>.
<u>Explanation</u>:
The first stage of team development is called team forming. The members of the team get oriented and acquainted with each other during team forming.
There are five different stages of team development. They are as follows:
i) Forming
ii) Storming
iii) Norming
iv) Performing
v) Adjourning
Storming explains the emergence of roles and conflicts within the group. The conflict is being solved and unity is maintained in norming stage. Performing ensures problem solving and completing the given task. Disbandment of the team takes place as last stage in team development.
