All categories

1 year ago

2. Un auto viaja a 60 km/h y se detiene a los 2 segundos. qué distancia recorrió en el

Mathematics

1 answer:

posledela1 year ago

5 0

Se calcula que la aceleración es - 8,35 m/s.

<h3 /><h3>¿Qué es la aceleración?</h3>

Ahora sabemos lo siguiente de la pregunta;

Velocidad inicial (u) = 60 km/h o 16,7 m/s

Tiempo empleado (t) = 2 s

Dado que;

v = tu + en

v = 0 m/s porque el carro se detenía

tu = -en

a = -(u/t)

a= -1(6,7 m/s/2 s)

a =- 8,35 m/s

La aceleración es negativa porque la velocidad disminuye con el tiempo.

Obtenga más información sobre la aceleración: brainly.com/question/12550364

#SPJ1

You might be interested in

The two triangles are congruent as suggested by their appearance. Find the value of c. The diagrams are not to scale.

GalinKa [24]

Answer:

A.3

Step-by-step explanation:

the key word is Congruent ^_^

3 0

2 years ago

I cant figure it out, and if I get this wrong I fail the test

Oliga [24]

Step-by-step explanation:

x = 1.21212121.....

100x = 121.21212121...

Therefore 99x = 120 and x = 120/99 = 40/33.

3 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

The sum of 86, 68, and 38 is 192. What else do you know about the sum of 68, 38, and 86?

Sveta_85 [38]

<span>We have 2 given numbers:
=> 86 + 68 + 38 = 192
=> 68 + 38 + 86 = 192 also
This kind of process used commutative property system of equation in where:
a + b = b + a
No matter what sequence you are going to use, the answer would always be the same.
In the given 2 equations, notice that both digits of 2 group of equation contains the same number. The only difference is they were added with different orders. Yet the answers are still the same.

</span>

8 0

3 years ago

HELP I REALLY NEED AN ANSWER WILL GIVE BRAINLIEST IF I CANNNNN

dmitriy555 [2]

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

6 0

3 years ago

According to the February 2008 Federal Trade Commission report on consumer fraud and identity theft, 23% of all complaints in 20

Murljashka [212]

Answer:

There is not enough evidence to support the claim that Alaska had a lower proportion of identity theft than 23%.

Step-by-step explanation:

We are given the following in the question:

Sample size, n = 1432

p = 23% = 0.23

Alpha, α = 0.05

Number of theft complaints , x = 321

First, we design the null and the alternate hypothesis

$H_{0}: p = 0.23\\H_A: p < 0.23$

This is a one-tailed test.

Formula:

$\hat{p} = \dfrac{x}{n} = \dfrac{321}{1432} =0.2241$

$z = \dfrac{\hat{p}-p}{\sqrt{\dfrac{p(1-p)}{n}}}$

Putting the values, we get,

$z = \displaystyle\frac{0.2241-0.23}{\sqrt{\frac{0.23(1-0.23)}{1432}}} = -0.5305$

Now, we calculate the p-value from the table.

P-value = 0.298

Since the p-value is greater than the significance level, we fail to reject the null hypothesis and accept the null hypothesis.

Conclusion:

Thus, there is not enough evidence to support the claim that Alaska had a lower proportion of identity theft than 23%.

5 0

3 years ago